Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHackett, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorThorneloe, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorSide, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorHorne, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorCuzick, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, SGen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-27T12:20:02Z
dc.date.available2018-03-30en_US
dc.date.issued2018-08en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-04-20T13:33:51.750Z
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10549-018-4775-1
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/45463
dc.descriptionThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment . The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4775-1en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Uptake of preventive therapy for women at increased breast cancer risk in England is unknown following the introduction of UK clinical guidelines in 2013. Preventive therapy could create socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence if it is more readily accepted by particular socio-demographic groups. In this multicentre study, we investigated uptake of tamoxifen and evaluated socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with initiation. We explored women's experiences of treatment decision-making using qualitative interview data. METHODS: Between September 2015 and December 2016, women (n = 732) attending an appointment at one of 20 centres in England to discuss breast cancer risk were approached to complete a survey containing socio-demographic details and nulliparity. Of the baseline survey respondents (n = 408/732, 55.7% response rate), self-reported uptake of tamoxifen at 3-month follow-up was reported in 258 (63.2%). Sixteen women participated in semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: One in seven (38/258 = 14.7%) women initiated tamoxifen. Women who had children were more likely to report use of tamoxifen than those without children (OR = 5.26; 95%CI: 1.13-24.49, p = 0.035). Interview data suggested that women weigh up risks and benefits of tamoxifen within the context of familial commitments, with exposure to significant other's beliefs and experiences of cancer and medication a basis for their decision. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of tamoxifen is low in clinical practice. There were no socio-demographic differences in uptake, suggesting that the introduction of breast cancer preventive therapy is unlikely to create socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence. Women's decision-making was influenced by familial priorities, particularly having children.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJC has received research funding and honoraria from AstraZeneca. RJT has received honorarium from Novartis. SGS was supported by a Cancer Research UK postdoctoral fellowship (C42785/A17965) during the collection of these data. He also acknowledges funding support from a Yorkshire Cancer Research University Academic Fellowship. JC is supported by Cancer Research UK.en_US
dc.format.extent633 - 640en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBreast Cancer Res Treaten_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution
dc.subjectBreast canceren_US
dc.subjectChemopreventionen_US
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectMedicationen_US
dc.subjectPreventive therapyen_US
dc.titleUptake of breast cancer preventive therapy in the UK: results from a multicentre prospective survey and qualitative interviews.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s) 2018
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10549-018-4775-1en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29687178en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume170en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-03-30en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record