Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, DAen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorRathod, KSen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichards, AJen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndiapen, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMathur, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorAhluwalia, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-07T15:46:47Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04en_US
dc.date.issued2019-03en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-08-08T12:18:53.252Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/44365
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES:: In the follow-up of patients in a trial of intracoronary sodium nitrite given during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), we found a reduction in the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Specifically, MACE rates were 5.2% versus 25.0% with placebo at 3 years ( P = .013). Such MACE reductions should also be associated with economic benefit. Thus, we assessed the cost utility of sodium nitrite therapy versus standard primary PCI only. METHODS AND RESULTS:: We developed a model to simulate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over the first 36 months after ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). Decision tree analysis was used to assess different potential cardiovascular outcomes after STEMI for patients in both treatment groups. Model inputs were derived from the NITRITE-AMI study. Cost of comparative treatments and follow-up in relation to cardiovascular events was calculated from the United Kingdom National Health Service perspective. Higher procedural costs for nitrite treatment were offset by lower costs for repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure compared to primary PCI plus placebo. Nitrite treatment was associated with higher utility values (0.91 ± 0.19 vs 0.82 ± 0.30, P = .041). The calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £2177 per QALY indicates a cost-effective strategy. Furthermore, positive results were maintained when input parameters varied, indicating the robustness of our model. In fact, based on the difference in utility values, the cost of nitrite could increase by 4-fold (£2006 per vial) and remain cost-effective. CONCLUSION:: This first analysis of sodium nitrite as a cardioprotective treatment demonstrates cost-effectiveness. Although more comparative analysis and assessment of longer follow-up times are required, our data indicate the considerable potential of nitrite-mediated cardioprotection.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR)en_US
dc.format.extent113 - 119en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJ Cardiovasc Pharmacol Theren_US
dc.subjectacute myocardial infarctionen_US
dc.subjecteconomicsen_US
dc.subjectischemia–reperfusionen_US
dc.subjectnitric oxideen_US
dc.subjectnitriteen_US
dc.titleSodium Nitrite-Mediated Cardioprotection in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1074248418784940en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30081658en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume24en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record