Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVázquez, MAen_US
dc.contributor.authorMariño, IPen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlyuss, Oen_US
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorGentry-Maharaj, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorKalsi, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorManchanda, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorMenon, Uen_US
dc.contributor.authorZaikin, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T07:31:08Z
dc.date.available2018-07-03en_US
dc.date.issued2018-09en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-07-23T22:09:09.575Z
dc.identifier.issn1746-8094en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/42483
dc.description.abstractWe present a quantitative study of the performance of two automatic methods for the early detection of ovarian cancer that can exploit longitudinal measurements of multiple biomarkers. The study is carried out for a subset of the data collected in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). We use statistical analysis techniques, such as the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, for evaluating the performance of two techniques that aim at the classification of subjects as either healthy or suffering from the disease using time-series of multiple biomarkers as inputs. The first method relies on a Bayesian hierarchical model that establishes connections within a set of clinically interpretable parameters. The second technique is a purely discriminative method that employs a recurrent neural network (RNN) for the binary classification of the inputs. For the available dataset, the performance of the two detection schemes is similar (the area under ROC curve is 0.98 for the combination of three biomarkers) and the Bayesian approach has the advantage that its outputs (parameters estimates and their uncertainty) can be further analysed by a clinical expert.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by Cancer Research UK and the Eve Appeal Gynaecological Cancer Research Fund (grant ref. A12677) and was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre. UKCTOCS was core funded by the Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK, and the Department of Health with additional support from the Eve Appeal, Special Trustees of Bart's and the London, and Special Trustees of UCLH. We also acknowledge support by the grant of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Agreement No. 074-02-2018-330. I.P.M. and M.A.V. acknowledge the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (projects TEC2015-69868-C2-1-R and TEC2017-86921-C2-1-R).en_US
dc.format.extent86 - 93en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiomed Signal Process Controlen_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectBayesian estimationen_US
dc.subjectBiomarkersen_US
dc.subjectChange-point detectionen_US
dc.subjectDeep learningen_US
dc.subjectGibbs samplingen_US
dc.subjectMarkov chainen_US
dc.subjectMonte Carloen_US
dc.subjectOvarian canceren_US
dc.subjectRecurrent neural networksen_US
dc.titleA quantitative performance study of two automatic methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2018 The Authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bspc.2018.07.001en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30245736en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume46en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record