Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorKorszun, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorEva, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorSURECAN investigatorsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-11T15:06:42Z
dc.date.available2018-06-07en_US
dc.date.issued2018-06-22en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-07-03T15:23:01.300Z
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s13063-018-2728-y
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/42045
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were madeen_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The randomised control trial (RCT) is the most rigorous method of evaluating interventions. Recruitment is often slower and more challenging than expected. The aim of the current paper is to understand the feasibility of recruitment within the NHS and the barriers and motivators to recruitment from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: NHS HCPs were surveyed to establish their willingness to participate. Twenty HCPs were interviewed to establish barriers and motivators to recruitment. Eleven patients were interviewed to understand their willingness to participate. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: HCP interviews identified key barriers to recruitment: practical barriers included workload and time; clinical barriers included terminology and concern that the trial implied criticism of their current practice; and patient barriers included gender and cultural factors. Motivators to recruitment included: regular communication between research and clinical teams; feedback on findings; and patient and individual benefits for clinicians. Patient interviews suggested that participation in a trial of a psychosocial intervention would strengthen existing coping skills and develop mechanisms for those who were struggling. CONCLUSIONS: Survey results demonstrated that recruitment to an RCT of a psychosocial intervention for people living with and beyond cancer would be feasible within the NHS if specific barriers are addressed. From a clinician point of view, barriers should be addressed to improve recruitment, particularly training and education of clinicians and clear communication. From a patient perspective, interventions and RCT should be tailored to target those not routinely represented in RCTs.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (Reference Number RP-DG-1212-10014).en_US
dc.format.extent327 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTrialsen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectNHSen_US
dc.subjectPsychosocialen_US
dc.subjectQualitative analysisen_US
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectRecruitmenten_US
dc.titleQualitative analysis of feasibility of recruitment and retention in a planned randomised controlled trial of a psychosocial cancer intervention within the NHS.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s). 2018
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-018-2728-yen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29929536en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume19en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-06-07en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record