Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLin, DWen_US
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, EDen_US
dc.contributor.authorKeane, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorReid, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorGutin, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorTward, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorScardino, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrawer, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorStone, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorCuzick, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-14T08:36:15Z
dc.date.available2018-03-15en_US
dc.date.issued2018-06en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-04-20T09:56:18.273Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/37883
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A combined clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score that incorporates prognostic molecular and clinical information has been recently developed and validated to improve prostate cancer mortality (PCM) risk stratification over clinical features alone. As clinical features are currently used to select men for active surveillance (AS), we developed and validated a CCR score threshold to improve the identification of men with low-risk disease who are appropriate for AS. METHODS: The score threshold was selected based on the 90th percentile of CCR scores among men who might typically be considered for AS based on NCCN low/favorable-intermediate risk criteria (CCR = 0.8). The threshold was validated using 10-year PCM in an unselected, conservatively managed cohort and in the subset of the same cohort after excluding men with high-risk features. The clinical effect was evaluated in a contemporary clinical cohort. RESULTS: In the unselected validation cohort, men with CCR scores below the threshold had a predicted mean 10-year PCM of 2.7%, and the threshold significantly dichotomized low- and high-risk disease (P = 1.2 × 10-5). After excluding high-risk men from the validation cohort, men with CCR scores below the threshold had a predicted mean 10-year PCM of 2.3%, and the threshold significantly dichotomized low- and high-risk disease (P = 0.020). There were no prostate cancer-specific deaths in men with CCR scores below the threshold in either analysis. The proportion of men in the clinical testing cohort identified as candidates for AS was substantially higher using the threshold (68.8%) compared to clinicopathologic features alone (42.6%), while mean 10-year predicted PCM risks remained essentially identical (1.9% vs. 2.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CCR score threshold appropriately dichotomized patients into low- and high-risk groups for 10-year PCM, and may enable more appropriate selection of patients for AS.en_US
dc.format.extent310.e7 - 310.e13en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrol Oncolen_US
dc.rights© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectBiopsyen_US
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPopulation Surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.subjectProstatectomyen_US
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten_US
dc.titleIdentification of men with low-risk biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer as candidates for active surveillance.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.011en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29655620en_US
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume36en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-03-12en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record