Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKowalski, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorUdy, AAen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcRobbie, HJen_US
dc.contributor.authorDooley, MJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-05T14:33:58Z
dc.date.available2016-09-09en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-12-16T00:07:13.992Z
dc.identifier.issn2052-0492en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/18386
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Active smokers are prevalent within the intensive care setting and place a significant burden on healthcare systems. Nicotine withdrawal due to forced abstinence on admission may contribute to increased agitation and delirium in this patient group. The aim of this systematic review was to determine whether management of nicotine withdrawal, with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), reduces agitation and delirium in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: The following sources were used in this review: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL Plus databases. Included studies reported delirium or agitation outcomes in current smokers, where NRT was used as management of nicotine withdrawal, in the intensive care setting. Studies were included regardless of design or number of participants. Data were extracted on ICU classification; study design; population baseline characteristics; allocation and dose of NRT; agitation and delirium assessment methods; and the frequency of agitation, delirium, and psychotropic medication use. RESULTS: Six studies were included. NRT was mostly prescribed for smokers with heavier smoking histories. Three studies reported an association between increased agitation or delirium and NRT use; one study could not find any significant benefit or harm from NRT use; and two described a reduction of symptomatic nicotine withdrawal. A lack of consistent and validated assessment measures, combined with limitations in the quality of reported data, contribute to conflicting results. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence for the use of NRT in agitation and delirium management in the ICU is inconclusive. An evaluation of risk versus benefit on an individual patient basis should be considered when prescribing NRT. Further studies that consider prognostic balance, adjust for confounders, and employ validated assessment tools are urgently needed.en_US
dc.format.extent69 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJ Intensive Careen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.subjectAgitationen_US
dc.subjectCritical careen_US
dc.subjectDeliriumen_US
dc.subjectIntensive care uniten_US
dc.subjectNicotine replacement therapyen_US
dc.subjectNicotine withdrawalen_US
dc.titleNicotine replacement therapy for agitation and delirium management in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of the literature.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2016 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40560-016-0184-xen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891229en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume4en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-09-09en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record