Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLanda, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorAraujo, JTen_US
dc.contributor.authorCLEGG, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorPavlou, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorFukuda, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-21T13:50:40Z
dc.date.available2016-12-06en_US
dc.date.issued2016-12-15en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-12-13T17:09:50.998Z
dc.identifier.issn1872-7069en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/18334
dc.description.abstractTCP remains the dominant transport protocol for Internet traffic. It is usually considered to have its sending rate covered by a sliding window congestion control mechanism. However, in addition to this normal congestion control, a number of other mechanisms limit TCP throughput. This paper analyzes the extent to which network, host and application settings define flow throughput over time and across autonomous systems. Our study draws on data from a longitudinal study spanning five years of passive traces collected from a single transit link. Mechanisms for this include limiting by application, interference with the TCP window control mechanism and artificial limitations on maximum window sizes by the operating system. This paper uses a large data set to assess the impact of each mechanism. We conclude that more than half of all heavy-hitter inbound traffic remains throttled by constraints beyond network capacity. For this data set, TCP congestion control is no longer the dominant mechanism that moderates throughput.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Networksen_US
dc.titleOn rate limitation mechanisms for TCP throughput: a longitudinal analysisen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.12.003
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-12-06en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record