• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Economic evaluation of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain. 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Blizard Institute
    • Centre for Primary Care and Public Health
    • Economic evaluation of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain.
    •   QMRO Home
    • Blizard Institute
    • Centre for Primary Care and Public Health
    • Economic evaluation of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain.
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Economic evaluation of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain.

    Volume
    57
    Pagination
    1220 - 1229
    DOI
    10.1002/art.23011
    Journal
    Arthritis Rheum
    Issue
    7
    ISSN
    0004-3591
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct an economic evaluation of the Enabling Self-Management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain through Exercise (ESCAPE-knee pain) program. METHODS: Alongside a clinical trial, we estimated the costs of usual primary care and participation in ESCAPE-knee pain delivered to individuals (Indiv-rehab) or groups of 8 participants (Grp-rehab). Information on resource use and informal care received was collected during face-to-face interviews. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility were assessed from between-group differences in costs, function (primary clinical outcome), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were constructed to represent uncertainty around cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: Rehabilitation (regardless of whether Indiv-rehab or Grp-rehab) cost 224 pounds (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 184 pounds, 262 pounds) more per person than usual primary care. The probability of rehabilitation being more cost-effective than usual primary care was 90% if decision makers were willing to pay 1,900 pounds for improvements in functioning. Indiv-rehab cost 314 pounds/person and Grp-rehab 125 pounds/person. Indiv-rehab cost 189 pounds (95% CI 168 pounds, 208 pounds) more per person than Grp-rehab. The probability of Indiv-rehab being more cost-effective than Grp-rehab increased as willingness to pay (WTP) increased, reaching 50% probability at WTP 5,500 pounds. The lack of differences in QALYs across the arms led to lower probabilities of cost-effectiveness based on this outcome. CONCLUSION: Provision of ESCAPE-knee pain had small cost implications, but it was more likely to be cost-effective in improving function than usual primary care. Group rehabilitation reduces costs without compromising clinical effectiveness, increasing probability of cost-effectiveness.
    Authors
    Hurley, MV; Walsh, NE; Mitchell, HL; Pimm, TJ; Williamson, E; Jones, RH; Reeves, BC; Dieppe, PA; Patel, A
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/17622
    Collections
    • Centre for Primary Care and Public Health [1575]
    Language
    eng
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.