• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    How to value patients with psychosis: An inductive study of psychiatrists’ behaviour in routine consultations. 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
    • Centre for Psychiatry
    • How to value patients with psychosis: An inductive study of psychiatrists’ behaviour in routine consultations.
    •   QMRO Home
    • Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine
    • Centre for Psychiatry
    • How to value patients with psychosis: An inductive study of psychiatrists’ behaviour in routine consultations.
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    How to value patients with psychosis: An inductive study of psychiatrists’ behaviour in routine consultations.

    View/Open
    Published version
    Embargoed until: 2100-01-01
    Reason: Publisher embargo
    Accepted version (80.30Kb)
    Volume
    12
    Pagination
    55 - 69
    Journal
    Commun Med
    Issue
    1
    ISSN
    1612-1783
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Valuing patients underlies good communication in psychiatry and mediates positive outcomes. The aim of this study was to (1) identify and reliably assess valuing and devaluing communicative behaviour of psychiatrists in routine consultations, and (2) explore whether valuing behaviour is associated with patient satisfaction. In an inductive study, psychiatrists’ valuing and devaluing behaviours were operationalized and identified in 100 video-recorded consultations with patients with psychosis. Inter-rater reliability of identifying these behaviours was assessed. Associations with patients’ satisfaction were explored using a mixed linear regression model. We identified 18 different valuing behaviours – e.g. seeking patient’s views and supportive statements – and four devaluing behaviours – e.g. talking over the patient and poor responding to concerns – that could be assessed with good reliability. The inter-rater reliability was high (ICC=.89). More valuing behaviour was linked to higher patient satisfaction with the communication (β=.45, CI .14 to.77, p p<.01). It was found that psychiatrists value and devalue patients through a wide range of different behaviours, on which there is agreement among different observers. The inductively developed list of valuing behaviours may be validated through the association with higher patient satisfaction. The behaviours may be used in training and supervision to enhance the valuing of patients in consultations.
    Authors
    John, P; Khanom, H; Cameli, M; McCabe, R; Priebe, S
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/13111
    Collections
    • Centre for Psychiatry [662]
    Language
    eng
    Copyright statements
    Copyright © 2016 Equinox Publishing Ltd
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.