| dc.description.abstract | This thesis postulates the annihilation of the poor as the authorised end of development.
This circumstance, I contend, is an effect of the entanglement – that is, the mutual
affectability (Barad 2007) – of the human and capital as descriptors of ethical and
economic value, respectively. Accordingly, I suggest that the annihilation of the poor by
capital under the sign of development is authorised as the preservation of value. I
designate this as the postcolonial capitalist condition. The argument unfolds through
encounters with three sites that have become metonymic with destruction wrought by
development: the state response to peasant revolt against land expropriation in
Nandigram, the Bhopal gas leak, and the recently emergent surrogacy market. I offer
these as different instantiations of the annihilation of the poor, each of which gives lie to
the recuperative myth of development. Here, annihilation proceeds by leaving a material
trace upon the body. I follow this trace to argue the indispensability of the body in
performing the ideological work of development – that is, to preserve an idealised
appearance as human through the eradication of the poor that appear as subaltern – even
as it establishes itself as an emancipatory truth. Thus, in this thesis I offer an analysis of
the violence of capital not as socio-materially imposed (per Karl Marx) but rather as an
onto-materially authorised (following Georges Bataille). As such, I seek to explicate the
differential mattering of bodies – as both, appearance and significance – under
development. | en_US |
