• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    A critical approach towards the substantive appraisal of joint ventures under the EU merger control regime 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Queen Mary University of London Theses
    • Theses
    • A critical approach towards the substantive appraisal of joint ventures under the EU merger control regime
    •   QMRO Home
    • Queen Mary University of London Theses
    • Theses
    • A critical approach towards the substantive appraisal of joint ventures under the EU merger control regime
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    A critical approach towards the substantive appraisal of joint ventures under the EU merger control regime

    View/Open
    Bas_K_PhD_Final_200913.pdf (1.788Mb)
    Publisher
    Queen Mary University of London
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Joint ventures are a widely used form of interfirm collaboration, which possess some characteristics of both mergers, in which two or more firms come permanently under common control and cease to be distinct, and agreements, which impact the competitive behaviour of firms that remain independent of each other. Due to their hybrid economic nature, it has always been controversial what types of joint ventures should be regarded as mergers under competition law, and how the fact that the parent firms remain independent outside the cooperation should be incorporated into traditional merger analysis. In the EU, only full-function joint ventures are treated as mergers under the Merger Regulation. However, unlike amalgamations and acquisitions, these joint ventures are subject to an additional analysis under Article 101 TFEU to the extent that they lead to the coordination of the competitive behaviour of the parents. This thesis aims to critically analyse this approach to the substantive appraisal of joint ventures under the EU merger control regime, based on its consistency with the general rules of EU competition law and with relevant economic theories, in a comparative perspective with the US competition law regime. In this regard, the thesis shows that (i) the full-functionality criterion assuming that full-function joint ventures are autonomous from an operational viewpoint has some negative implications for the competition analysis of joint ventures; and (ii) the fact that the parent firms retain activities in the joint venture’s market, or in other markets, does not seem to be properly incorporated into the analysis under the Merger Regulation. This thesis seeks to propose some alternatives and solutions with respect to these problematic issues and, thereby, contribute to the body of knowledge and debate about joint ventures which have been, and will be, one of the most intricate and controversial topics of competition law.
    Authors
    Baş, Kadir
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8806
    Collections
    • Theses [3315]
    Copyright statements
    The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.