• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    ‘So you feel a bit anxious?’ Psychiatrist-patient communication and treatment adherence in schizophrenia 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Queen Mary University of London Theses
    • Theses
    • ‘So you feel a bit anxious?’ Psychiatrist-patient communication and treatment adherence in schizophrenia
    •   QMRO Home
    • Queen Mary University of London Theses
    • Theses
    • ‘So you feel a bit anxious?’ Psychiatrist-patient communication and treatment adherence in schizophrenia
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    ‘So you feel a bit anxious?’ Psychiatrist-patient communication and treatment adherence in schizophrenia

    View/Open
    Laura Thompson_PhD.pdf (2.380Mb)
    Publisher
    Queen Mary University of London
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    24 million people worldwide are affected by schizophrenia. Its complex psychopathology, including changes in perception, can incur substantial personal distress and economic burden. Finding appropriate treatment that attracts voluntary adherence is an ongoing challenge for clinicians to prevent relapse and poor prognosis. This thesis conceives the psychiatrist-patient alliance - mediated through talk - as an intervention point that demands analytic attention. Conceptualising ‘good’ communication is however hindered by a lack of a) conceptual clarity on its constituents b) knowledge of what actually happens in psychiatric encounters. Abstract ideals of ‘Patient Centredness’ and ‘Shared Decision Making’ are widely endorsed as beneficial to adherence, but do not pragmatically translate into specific practices, conducive to training. Following a preparatory systematic review, this thesis addresses a gap in literature by observing psychiatric communication in 3 mixed method studies. Synthesising coding methodologies and statistical analyses with principles of conversation analysis, two studies explore the association - and explanatory mechanism - between adherence and specific communication practices: patient other-initiated repair and psychiatrist questions. Treatment decisions, the precursor to adherent behaviour, are also examined: alternative resources that psychiatrists employ and their interactional consequences are mapped, with a focus on patients’ overt resistance. The findings collectively extend knowledge on medical interaction and demonstrate the utility of a novel approach to outcome research in field dominated by cross sectional studies. Clinical, methodological and theoretical contributions are yielded relating to six themes 1) the consequentiality of psychiatrists’ communicative choices 2) the manifestation of alliance and adherence in clinical talk 3) orientations to experiential expertise and the contingencies of antipsychotic medication adherence 4) reconceptualising ‘good’ communication: misalignment as key to clinical success 5) evidence of the interaction order in schizophrenia 6) reconciling the nuances of naturalistic interaction with global clinical outcomes.
    Authors
    Thompson, Laura
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8561
    Collections
    • Theses [3592]
    Copyright statements
    The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.