Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrajeux, Marie-Aimee
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-20T12:08:22Z
dc.date.available2015-07-20T12:08:22Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-23
dc.identifier.citationBrajeux, M-A. 2015. ASBOs and the Community: Towards a New Model of Liability? Queen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7929
dc.descriptionThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the authoren_US
dc.description.abstracthis thesis argues that anti-social behaviour orders (ASBOs) are the imperfect expression of a new type of community-based liability which seeks to regulate an individual’s behaviour in the context of his relationship with a particular community. The combination of civil and criminal elements in ASBOs stems from a political will to address responsibility for behaviour which is harmful to a community. Despite the central conceptual role played by the community relationship in ASBOs, legal provisions have failed to define the nature of that relationship, relying on judicial discretion to shape the orders’ application in practice. Judicial interpretation of ASBO legislation confirms the alternative nature of the orders, and the importance of the concept of community in creating a different type of liability. From a theoretical perspective, communitarian principles provide a basis for explaining how the individual/community relationship can justify and shape liability. The figure of a responsible individual constituted by his social interactions forms the premise of this type of liability, and the concept of community in this context is established as a fluid rather than rigid notion, defined as a social group connected by a range of specific interests. A model of community-based liability can be constructed from these principles: interference with a community’s interests can justify the imposition of liability, provided the individual’s behaviour represents a wilful engagement with that particular community. This model of liability provides a useful framework through which to re-examine ASBOs. While the case law broadly adopts the defining elements mentioned above, the use of ASBOs shows examples of misapplications of the principles of a community-based model of liability. Nevertheless, this framework also shows how ASBOs can be seen as a flexible and potentially integrative approach to regulating different types of individual/community relationships, despite the missed opportunities sometimes created by their practical application.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.subjectASBO'sen_US
dc.subjectanti-social behaviour ordersen_US
dc.subjectbehaviour regulationen_US
dc.subjectindividual/community relationshipen_US
dc.subjectcommunitarian principlesen_US
dc.subjectsocial interactionen_US
dc.titleASBOs and the Community: Towards a New Model of Liability?en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [2752]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record