Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSutton, Shannon
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-25T09:46:42Z
dc.date.available2015-06-25T09:46:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7780
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.descriptionThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author.
dc.description.abstractThis research contributes to the growing body of knowledge about Fairtrade’s impact on producers by assessing voice and governance within producer organizations. I employ Fung and Wright’s (2003) framework of Empowered Participatory Governance (EPG) as a tool for understanding the challenges of collaborative governance as they relate to Fairtrade. EPG combines participation, decentralized decision-making, continuous deliberation and engagement, and co-operation between parties and interests, and as such is well suited to a consideration of Fairtrade governance. Through exploring EPG’s principles, design properties, and enabling conditions related to Fairtrade, I aim to learn more about whether or not this international system is truly achieving collaborative governance that enables individual producers to have a ‘stronger voice’. I consider Fung and Wright’s (2003) notion of countervailing power as a means of understanding how power structures may be challenged to the advantage of those who are typically marginalized within Fairtrade’s governance processes, and incorporate Hirschman’s (1970) work on exit, voice, and loyalty in order to explore alternatives to voice. This multiple case study focuses on Fairtrade coffee co-operatives in Tanzania. Over a period of two years, I conducted 139 individual interviews with key informants, managers, Board members, and producers in East Africa, held focus groups, and observed many events. Overall I found that Fairtrade creates opportunities for producer voice through its governance structures when (i) governance is collaborative and (ii) producers have substantial and equal access to capacity building. However, when individuals do not feel as though they have a voice, exit becomes a viable alternative.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project benefitted from the financial support of Queen Mary, University of London and the Canadian Co-operative Association.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.titleVoice, Choice, and Governance: The Case of Tanzania's Fairtrade Coffee Co-operativesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [2752]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record