Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCaspar, EA
dc.contributor.authorBeyer, F
dc.contributor.authorCleeremans, A
dc.contributor.authorHaggard, P
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-11T11:33:16Z
dc.date.available2021-11-11T11:33:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/75168
dc.description.abstractMilgram’s classical studies famously suggested a widespread willingness to obey authority, even to the point of inflicting harm. Important situational factors supporting obedience, such as proximity with the victim, have been established. Relatively little work has focused on how coercion affects individual cognition, or on identifying the cognitive factors that underlie inter-individual differences in the tendency to yield to coercion. Here, we used fMRI to investigate the neural systems associated with changes in volitional processes associated with sense of agency and sense of responsibility under coercion. Participants either freely chose, or were instructed by the experimenter, to give mildly painful electric shocks to another participant, or to refrain from doing so. We have previously shown that coercion reduces temporal binding, which has been proposed as an implicit proxy measure of sense of agency. We tested how reduced agency under coercion related to differences in neural activity between free choice and coercion. In contrast to previous studies and to participants performing the task outside the MRI scanner, on average there was no effect of coercion on agency for participants in the scanner. However, greater activity in the medial frontal gyrus was reliably associated with greater agency under coercion. A similar association was found using explicit responsibility ratings. Our findings suggest that medial frontal processes, perhaps related to volition during action planning and execution, may help to preserve a sense of accountability under coercion. Further, participants who administered more shocks under free choice showed reduced activity during free choice trials in brain areas associated with social cognition. Possibly, this might reflect participants cognitively distancing themselves from the recipient of the shocks under free choice, whereas this was not observed under coercion.en_US
dc.format.extente0258884 - e0258884
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLOS ONE
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.titleThe obedient mind and the volitional brain: A neural basis for preserved sense of agency and sense of responsibility under coercionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Caspar et al.
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0258884
pubs.issue10en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume16en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.