Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAman, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorMallick, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorNemlioglu, Ien_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T11:02:27Z
dc.date.available2021-06-09en_US
dc.date.available2021-08-04T11:02:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-12en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744-1374en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/73419
dc.description.abstractThe literature lacks consensus on the role of currency regimes in explaining external competitiveness. Countries not only differ in terms of currency regimes, but can also have different institutional arrangements, namely trade agreements and inflation targeting (IT) frameworks in addition to the overall quality of governance. Hence, using the real effective exchange rate and by covering 35 developing countries over the period 1975-2014, we investigate the role of currency regimes in explaining the degree of misalignment while considering institutional factors. First, we find that intermediate regimes limit the currency misalignment with greater financial openness (FO). Second, non-reciprocal preferential trade agreements improve price competitiveness, whereas free trade and reciprocal ones can only be beneficial with a higher degree of FO. Third, misalignments in fixed regimes decline in the presence of stronger institutions or in countries with an IT type of monetary policy framework. The above results remain robust to alternative specifications.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Institutional Economicsen_US
dc.titleCurrency regimes and external competitiveness: The role of institutions, trade agreements and monetary frameworksen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1744137421000503en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-09en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record