Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchofield, G
dc.contributor.authorDujon, A
dc.contributor.authorIerodiaconou, D
dc.contributor.authorGeeson, J
dc.contributor.authorArnould, J
dc.contributor.authorAllan, B
dc.contributor.authorKatselidis, K
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T11:07:03Z
dc.date.available2021-03-11
dc.date.available2021-05-27T11:07:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-06
dc.identifier.citationDujon, Antoine M. et al. "Machine Learning To Detect Marine Animals In UAV Imagery: Effect Of Morphology, Spacing, Behaviour And Habitat". Remote Sensing In Ecology And Conservation, 2021. Wiley, doi:10.1002/rse2.205. Accessed 27 May 2021.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2056-3485
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/72107
dc.description.abstractMachine learning algorithms are being increasingly used to process large volumes of wildlife imagery data from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); however, suitable algorithms to monitor multiple species are required to enhance efficiency. Here, we developed a machine learning algorithm using a low-cost computer. We trained a convolutional neural network and tested its performance in: (1) distinguishing focal organisms of three marine taxa (Australian fur seals, loggerhead sea turtles and Australasian gannets; body size ranges: 0.8–2.5 m, 0.6–1.0 m, and 0.8–0.9 m, respectively); and (2) simultaneously delineating the fine-scale movement trajectories of multiple sea turtles at a fish cleaning station. For all species, the algorithm performed best at detecting individuals of similar body length, displaying consistent behaviour or occupying uniform habitat (proportion of individuals detected, or recall of 0.94, 0.79 and 0.75 for gannets, seals and turtles, respectively). For gannets, performance was impacted by spacing (huddling pairs with offspring) and behaviour (resting vs. flying shapes, overall precision: 0.74). For seals, accuracy was impacted by morphology (sexual dimorphism and pups), spacing (huddling and creches) and habitat complexity (seal sized boulders) (overall precision: 0.27). For sea turtles, performance was impacted by habitat complexity, position in water column, spacing, behaviour (interacting individuals) and turbidity (overall precision: 0.24); body size variation had no impact. For sea turtle trajectories, locations were estimated with a relative positioning error of <50 cm. In conclusion, we demonstrate that, while the same machine learning algorithm can be used to survey multiple species, no single algorithm captures all components optimally within a given site. We recommend that, rather than attempting to fully automate detection of UAV imagery data, semi-automation is implemented (i.e. part automated and part manual, as commonly practised for photo-identification). Approaches to enhance the efficiency of manual detection are required in parallel to the development of effective implementation of machine learning algorithms.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Open Accessen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
dc.titleMachine learning to detect marine animals in UAV imagery: effect of morphology, spacing, behaviour and habitaten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authors. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rse2.205
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-03-11
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record