dc.contributor.author | Shanahan, TAG | |
dc.contributor.author | Fuller, GW | |
dc.contributor.author | Sheldon, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Turton, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Quilty, FMA | |
dc.contributor.author | Marincowitz, C | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-26T16:14:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-26T16:14:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/70907 | |
dc.description.abstract | IMPORTANCE: This paper investigates the use of a major trauma prediction model in the UK setting. We demonstrate that application of this model could reduce the number of patients with major trauma being incorrectly sent to non-specialist hospitals. However, more research is needed to reduce over-triage and unnecessary transfer to Major Trauma Centres. OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the Dutch prediction model for identifying major trauma in a large unselected prehospital population of injured patients in England. DESIGN: External validation using a retrospective cohort of injured patients who ambulance crews transported to hospitals. SETTING: South West region of England. PARTICIPANTS: All patients ≥16 years with a suspected injury and transported by ambulance in the year from February 1, 2017. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: 1) Patients aged ≤15 years; 2) Non-ambulance attendance at hospital with injuries; 3) Death at the scene and; 4) Patients conveyed by helicopter. This study had a census sample of cases available to us over a one year period. INTERVENTIONS OR EXPOSURES: Tested the accuracy of the prediction model in terms of discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness, sensitivity and specificity and under- and over triage rates compared to usual triage practices in the South West region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Major trauma defined as an Injury Severity Score>15. RESULTS: A total of 68799 adult patients were included in the external validation cohort. The median age of patients was 72 (i.q.r. 46-84); 55.5% were female; and 524 (0.8%) had an Injury Severity Score>15. The model achieved good discrimination with a C-Statistic 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73 - 0.78). The maximal specificity of 50% and sensitivity of 83% suggests the model could improve undertriage rates at the expense of increased overtriage rates compared with routine trauma triage methods used in the South West, England. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Dutch prediction model for identifying major trauma could lower the undertriage rate to 17%, however it would increase the overtriage rate to 50% in this United Kingdom cohort. Further prospective research is needed to determine whether the model can be practically implemented by paramedics and is cost-effective. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Injury | |
dc.title | External validation of the Dutch prediction model for prehospital triage of trauma patients in South West region of England, United Kingdom. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.039 | |
pubs.author-url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33581872 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | en_US |
pubs.publisher-url | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.039 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-01-22 | |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |