Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPope, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCoy, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T12:19:56Z
dc.date.issued2017-12en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/69566
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate factors associated with unscheduled admission following presentation to Emergency Departments (EDs) at three hospitals in England. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of attendance data for patients from three urban EDs in England: a large teaching hospital and major trauma centre (Site 1), and two district general hospitals (Sites 2 and 3). Variables included: patient age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation score, arrival date and time, arrival by ambulance or otherwise, a variety of ED workload measures, inpatient bed occupancy rates and admission outcome. Coding inconsistencies in routine ED data used for this study meant that diagnosis could not be included. OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome for the study was unscheduled admission. PARTICIPANTS: All adults aged 16 and over attending the three inner London EDs in December 2013. Data on 19 734 unique patient attendances were gathered. RESULTS: Outcome data were available for 19 721 attendances (>99%), of whom 6263 (32%) were admitted to hospital. Site 1 was set as the baseline site for analysis of admission risk. Risk of admission was significantly greater at Sites 2 and 3 (AOR relative to Site 1 for Site 2 was 1.89, 95% CI:1.74 to 2.05, p<0.001), and for patients of black or black British ethnicity (1.29, 1.16-1.44, p<0.001). Deprivation was strongly associated with admission. Analysis of departmental and hospital-wide workload pressures gave conflicting results, but proximity to the 'four-hour target' (a rule that limits patient stays in EDs to four hours in the NHS in England) emerged as a strong driver for admission in this analysis (3.61, 3.30-3.95, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found statistically significant variations in odds of admission between hospital sites when adjusting for various patient demographic and presentation factors, suggesting important variations in ED- and clinician-level behaviour relating to admission decisions. The four-hour target is a strong driver for emergency admission.en_US
dc.format.extentA875 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEmerg Med Jen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiesen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Service, Hospitalen_US
dc.subjectEnglanden_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHospitalizationen_US
dc.subjectHospitals, Urbanen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen_US
dc.title20 Risk factors for admission at three, urban emergency departments in england: a cross-sectional analysis of attendances over one month.en_US
dc.title.alternativeRisk factors for admission at 3, urban emergency departments in England: a cross-sectional analysis of attendances over 1 month.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2017-207308.20en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29170317en_US
pubs.issue12en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume34en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record