Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaynard-Smith, L
dc.contributor.authorBrown, CS
dc.contributor.authorHarris, RJ
dc.contributor.authorHodkinson, P
dc.contributor.authorTamne, S
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, SR
dc.contributor.authorZenner, D
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T15:10:42Z
dc.date.available2020-10-27
dc.date.available2021-01-06T15:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/69528
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends following up passengers following possible exposure to a case of infectious tuberculosis (TB) during air travel. This is known to be time consuming and difficult, and increasingly so with higher numbers of flights and passengers to and from countries with high TB endemicity each year. OBJECTIVES: This paper systematically reviews the literature on contact tracing investigations following a plane exposure to active pulmonary TB. Evidence for in-flight transmission was assessed by reviewing the positive results of contacts without prior risk factors for latent TB. DATA SOURCES & ELIGIBILITY: A search of Medline, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Cochrane Library and Database of Systematic Reviews was carried out, with no restrictions on study design, index case characteristics, duration of flight or publication date. RESULTS: Twenty-two papers were included, with a total of 469 index cases and 15 889 contacts. Only 26.4% of all contacts identified completed screening following exposure. The yield of either a single positive tuberculin skin test (TST) or a TST conversion attributable to in-flight transmission is between 0.19% (95%CI 0.13-0.27) and 0.74% (95%CI 0.61-0.88) of all contacts identified (0.00%, 95%CI 0.00-0.00 and 0.13%, 95%CI 0.00-0.61 in random effects meta-analysis). LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is heterogeneity of reporting. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS: The evidence behind the criteria for initiating investigations is weak and it has been widely demonstrated that active screening of contacts is labour intensive and unlikely to be effective. Based on our findings, formal comprehensive contact tracing may be of limited utility following a plane exposure.en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherEuropean Respiratory Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEur Respir J
dc.rightsThis is an author-submitted, peer-reviewed version of a manuscript that has been accepted for publication in the European Respiratory Journal, prior to copy-editing, formatting and typesetting. This version of the manuscript may not be duplicated or reproduced without prior permission from the European Respiratory Society. The publisher is not responsible or liable for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or in any version derived from it by any other parties. The final, copy-edited, published article, which is the version of record, is available without a subscription 18 months after the date of issue publication.
dc.titleAir-travel related TB incident follow up - effectiveness and outcomes: a systematic review.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright ©ERS 2020
dc.identifier.doi10.1183/13993003.00013-2020
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33214208en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00013-2020
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-10-27
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record