Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShennan, A
dc.contributor.authorChandiramani, M
dc.contributor.authorBennett, P
dc.contributor.authorDavid, AL
dc.contributor.authorGirling, J
dc.contributor.authorRidout, A
dc.contributor.authorSeed, PT
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, N
dc.contributor.authorThornton, S
dc.contributor.authorTydeman, G
dc.contributor.authorQuenby, S
dc.contributor.authorCarter, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-28T10:21:27Z
dc.date.available2019-09-16
dc.date.available2020-04-28T10:21:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.identifier.citationShennan A, Chandiramani M, Bennett P, et al. MAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;222:261.e1-9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-6868
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/63779
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Vaginal cerclage (a suture around the cervix) commonly is placed in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. These women may experience late miscarriage or extreme preterm delivery, despite being treated with cerclage. Transabdominal cerclage has been advocated after failed cerclage, although its efficacy is unproved by randomized controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare transabdominal cerclage or high vaginal cerclage with low vaginal cerclage in women with a history of failed cerclage. Our primary outcome was delivery at <32 completed weeks of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Women were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to receive transabdominal cerclage, high vaginal cerclage, or low vaginal cerclage either before conception or at <14 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: The data for 111 of 139 women who were recruited and who conceived were analyzed: 39 had transabdominal cerclage; 39 had high vaginal cerclage, and 33 had low vaginal cerclage. Rates of preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation were significantly lower in women who received transabdominal cerclage compared with low vaginal cerclage (8% [3/39] vs 33% [11/33]; relative risk, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.76; P=.0157). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 preterm birth was 3.9 (95% confidence interval, 2.32-12.1). There was no difference in preterm birth rates between high and low vaginal cerclage (38% [15/39] vs 33% [11/33]; relative risk, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-2.16; P=.81). No neonatal deaths occurred. In an exploratory analysis, women with transabdominal cerclage had fewer fetal losses compared with low vaginal cerclage (3% [1/39] vs 21% [7/33]; relative risk, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.016-0.93; P=.02). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 fetal loss was 5.3 (95% confidence interval, 2.9-26). CONCLUSION: Transabdominal cerclage is the treatment of choice for women with failed vaginal cerclage. It is superior to low vaginal cerclage in the reduction of risk of early preterm birth and fetal loss in women with previous failed vaginal cerclage. High vaginal cerclage does not confer this benefit. The numbers needed to treat are sufficiently low to justify transabdominal surgery and cesarean delivery required in this select cohort.en_US
dc.format.extent261.e1 - 261.e9
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofAm J Obstet Gynecol
dc.rights© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectfailed cerclageen_US
dc.subjectlate miscarriageen_US
dc.subjecttransabdominal cerclageen_US
dc.subjectvaginal cerclageen_US
dc.titleMAVRIC: a multicenter randomized controlled trial of transabdominal vs transvaginal cervical cerclage.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.040
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31585096en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.040
pubs.volume222en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-09-16
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record