Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFudge, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, CDAen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcKevitt, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-23T13:50:30Z
dc.date.issued2008-02-09en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/62512
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To understand how the policy of user involvement is interpreted in health service organisations and to identify factors that influence how user involvement is put into practice. DESIGN: Ethnographic study using participant observation, interviews, and collection of documentary evidence. SETTING: A multiagency modernisation programme to improve stroke services in two London boroughs. PARTICIPANTS: Service users, National Health Service managers, and clinicians. RESULTS: User involvement in the programme was initiated and led by professionals. Professionals determined the areas of service improvement service users could participate in. A wide range of activities were considered "user involvement," from patient satisfaction surveys to service users delivering peer support. Involvement tended to be most active in the least technical areas and areas with least input from clinicians. Factors that might explain this included organisational structure, the vagueness of the concept of user involvement, the value attributed to service users' experiential knowledge, and variations in professional and service user understandings of and commitment to involvement. The gains of involvement were harder to identify in terms of impact on services. More evident were the personal gains for those involved: satisfaction of feeling listened to by professionals, social opportunities of meeting others in a similar situation, and increased knowledge about stroke and services available. CONCLUSIONS: User involvement may not automatically lead to improved service quality. Healthcare professionals and service users understand and practise user involvement in different ways according to individual ideologies, circumstances, and needs. Given the resource implications of undertaking user involvement in service development there is a need for critical debate on the purpose of such involvement as well as better evidence of the benefits claimed for it.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by a grant from the Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation. CM is funded by a Department of Health career scientist award. CDAW acknowledges financial support from the Department of Health through the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre awarded to Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London.en_US
dc.format.extent313 - 317en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practiceen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLondonen_US
dc.subjectPatient Participationen_US
dc.subjectState Medicineen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.titleAssessing the promise of user involvement in health service development: ethnographic study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder2008. The authors
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.39456.552257.BEen_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18230646en_US
pubs.issue7639en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume336en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License