Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGatt, JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorEmond, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorHadfield, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorMason-Jones, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorReid, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorTheron, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorUngar, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorWouldes, TAen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Qen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-10T10:25:26Z
dc.date.available2019-12-17en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-0640en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/62311
dc.description.abstractResilience is a dynamic process of positive adaptation to significant adversity. While there has been substantial focus on risks and negative outcomes associated with youth migrancy, there is limited evidence of the relationship between the adversity of migration, and resilience, wellbeing, and positive mental health in adolescents. This international study aimed to explore the differences in resilience, wellbeing, and mental health behaviors in migrant and non-migrant adolescents tested across six countries (Australia, New Zealand, UK, China, South Africa, and Canada) with varying levels of trauma exposure. The study was a cross-sectional survey design with a convenience sample of 194 10-17 year old migrants and non-migrants. The migrant sample included both "internal" migrants (change of residence within a country) and "external" migrants (change of residence across national borders) for comparison. Across the sites, migrants reported a higher mean number of traumatic events for the past year than non-migrants, with internal migrants reporting more events than external migrants overall. South African adolescents reported a higher mean number of traumatic events for the past year than all other sites. External migrants reported higher resilience scores yet reduced prosocial behaviors relative to internal migrants and non-migrants, whereas both internal and external migrants reported higher peer problems than non-migrants. When considering the interacting effects of trauma, the presence or absence of trauma did not appear to impact migrant scores in terms of resilience, wellbeing, or conduct problems. In comparison, trauma-exposed non-migrants showed detriments relative to trauma-exposed migrant peers for all of these measures. In conclusion, the survey tool was found to be reliable and acceptable for use in international studies of different samples of adolescent migrants. Overall, migrant adolescents showed greater resilience resources than non-migrants and, although the migrants experienced more traumatic events, the impact of trauma on mental health outcomes was greater in the non-migrants. There is a need for further research with larger prospective sample sizes to investigate how levels of resilience and wellbeing vary over time and across countries, and the ways resilience can be promoted in adolescents exposed to trauma, regardless of migrancy status.en_US
dc.format.extent997 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFront Psychiatryen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectCOMPAS-Wen_US
dc.subjectCYRM-28en_US
dc.subjectmental healthen_US
dc.subjectmigranten_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subjecttraumaen_US
dc.subjectwellbeingen_US
dc.subjectyouthen_US
dc.titleTrauma, Resilience, and Mental Health in Migrant and Non-Migrant Youth: An International Cross-Sectional Study Across Six Countries.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holderCopyright: © 2019 Gatt, Alexander, Emond, Foster, Hadfield, Mason-Jones, Reid, Theron, Ungar, Wouldes and Wu.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00997en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32210844en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume10en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-17en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.