Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPick, Aen_US
dc.contributor.editorPick, Aen_US
dc.contributor.editorSaxton, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-04T09:54:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-01en_US
dc.date.issued2019-10-17en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-8334en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/61700
dc.description.abstractThis article explores Simone Weil’s concept of ‘affliction’ and the black poetics of Saidiya Hartman and Fred Moten in relation to two nonfiction films: Artur Aristakisyan’s Palms (1993) and Forough Farrokhzad’s The House Is Black (1962). The films’ contentiousness springs from their provocative depictions of suffering, presented not as a social ill but as a defiant mode of being outside of institutional power. Supplanting the search for a cure with the search for salvation, the films transcend the socially-conscious logic of documentary in favour of a ‘religious algorithm’ of profound but recalcitrant weakness. As alternative ‘city symphonies’, Palms and The House Is Black’s municipal visions complement Hartman and Moten’s vivid accounts of insurgent black life in American cities.en_US
dc.format.extent387 - 402en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEdinburgh University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofParagraph: a journal of modern critical theoryen_US
dc.titleFilm's Religious Algorithmen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder(c) 2019 Edinburgh University Press
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume42en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-07-01en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record