Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T10:50:53Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-831Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/61327
dc.description.abstract© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. Little is known about variation in the efficacy of financial participation across countries. This article examines the relationship between two types of financial participation (profit-sharing and employee share-ownership) and labour productivity across 29 European countries using a representative workplace survey. Consistent with theoretical expectations, profit-sharing is associated with superior labour productivity when it is open to all employees, whilst the evidence for employee share-ownership is more mixed. Analysis reveals considerable variation in the efficacy of both schemes across Europe. Country-level collective bargaining coverage has the greatest explanatory power in accounting for cross-country variation in efficacy. In countries with higher levels of collective bargaining coverage, profit-sharing performs less well, whereas employee share-ownership performs better, relative to countries with lower collective bargaining coverage. These findings shed light on the comparative dimension of the financial participation–labour productivity link.en_US
dc.format.extent195 - 227en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEconomic and Industrial Democracyen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding variation in the efficacy of financial participation across Europe: The role of country-level factorsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2018, © SAGE Publications
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0143831X15620846en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume39en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record