Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, J
dc.contributor.authorLeamy, M
dc.contributor.authorPesola, F
dc.contributor.authorBird, V
dc.contributor.authorBoutillier, CL
dc.contributor.authorSlade, M
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T10:39:52Z
dc.date.available2019-06-20T10:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, J., Leamy, M., Pesola, F., Bird, V., Boutillier, C., & Slade, M. (2015). Psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR). British Journal of Psychiatry, 207(6), 551-555. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161695en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1250
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/58124
dc.description.abstractBackground Supporting recovery is the aim of national mental health policy in many countries. However, only one measure of recovery has been developed in England: the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR), which measures recovery from the perspective of adult mental health service users with a psychosis diagnosis. Aims To independently evaluate the psychometric properties of the 15- and 22-item versions of the QPR. Method Two samples were used: data-set 1 (n = 88) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months. Data-set 2 (n = 399; trial registration: ISRCTN02507940) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline and 1 year. Results For the 15-item version, internal consistency was 0.89, convergent validity was 0.73, test–retest reliability was 0.74 and sensitivity to change was 0.40. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 15-item version offered a good fit. For the 22-item version, the interpersonal subscale was found to underperform and the intrapersonal subscale overlaps substantially with the 15-item version. Conclusions Both the 15-item and the intrapersonal subscale of the 22-item versions of the QPR demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The 15-item version is slightly more robust and also less burdensome, so it can be recommended for use in research and clinical practice.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) Programme (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-0707-10040), and in relation to the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College Londonen_US
dc.format.extent551 - 555
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal College of Psychiatristsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Psychiatry
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectrecovery-oriented practiceen_US
dc.subjectservice user-rated measurementen_US
dc.titlePsychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderRoyal College of Psychiatrists, 2015
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/bjp.bp.114.161695
pubs.issue6en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume207en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funderDeveloping a recovery focus in mental health services in England::National Institute of Health Researchen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record