Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPike, Karl
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-18T08:45:57Z
dc.date.issued08/04/2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/58078
dc.descriptionPhD thesisen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis makes a theoretical contribution to interpreting the Labour Party and an empirical contribution to our understanding of Labour’s ‘modernisation’, from 1983-1997. It significantly develops Henry Drucker’s original insight – that Labour has an ethos as well as doctrine – and systematises it into a theoretical framework around four ‘fault lines’ within Labour’s ethos. The fault lines are: the relative prioritisation given to articulating a coherent socialist theory; policies simultaneously regarded as both emblems and outdated shibboleths; tension between autonomy for Labour politicians and participatory approaches to decision-making; and more ‘expressive’ or more ‘instrumental’ political styles. The study argues that both an individual interpretation of the party’s ethos, held by a political actor, and a dominant interpretation of the party’s ethos, perceived by actors to have greater salience in the party as a whole, help to shape the strategic calculations actors make. Ethos is considered a distinct determinant of party change in this regard. The empirical contribution challenges linear narratives of modernisation from Kinnock to Blair. The study argues that different interpretations of the party’s ethos affected the pace and scale of modernisation after 1983. At times this made the political strategy of modernisation cautious and gradualist, sensitised as it was to Labour’s competing traditions. Kinnock’s leadership was inwardly pragmatic, yet outwardly cautious in engaging with Labour’s creed and challenging emblematic policies. This led to periods of inaction, appearing to defy electoral rationality. Blair was more attuned to Labour’s ethos than is sometimes suggested in the existing literature, selective in his challenges to Labour’s traditions, and employing, at times, an expressive style of Labour politics. Through interviews, archival research and document analysis, this study delves into political processes. It examines the beliefs actors held, their judgements of the party and their strategies, to show the effect of ethos on political action.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of London
dc.subjectElectronic Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.subjectdigital dataen_US
dc.subjectdata arten_US
dc.titleThe party has a life of its own: Labour’s ethos and party modernisation, 1983-1997en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [4235]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record