Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVon Graevenitz, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T13:12:53Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-10en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/57673
dc.description.abstractOn March 15th the IP Conversazione took place in Oxford as part of the 17th Annual Oxford International Intellectual Property Law Moot. The moot pitted students of IP law from around the world against each other to argue a trade mark case involving two identical trade marks used for different but reasonably similar goods. Roger Teichman and I were invited to speak to participants about work related to this question. This post summarises some of my comments and adds some details that have emerged since.en_US
dc.format.mediumBlog
dc.format.mediumBlogen_US
dc.format.mediumBlogen_US
dc.format.mediumBlogen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjecttrademarken_US
dc.subjectbranden_US
dc.subjectclutteren_US
dc.titlePopular Brand Names and Clutteren_US
dc.typeInternet Publication
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://busanalyticsblog.wordpress.com/2019/03/27/popular-brand-names-and-clutter/en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funderValuing Intangibles: Ranking Brands, Measuring Trade Mark Use::Economic and Social Research Councilen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record