dc.contributor.author | Von Graevenitz, G | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-21T13:12:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/57673 | |
dc.description.abstract | On March 15th the IP Conversazione took place in Oxford as part of the 17th Annual Oxford International Intellectual Property Law Moot. The moot pitted students of IP law from around the world against each other to argue a trade mark case involving two identical trade marks used for different but reasonably similar goods. Roger Teichman and I were invited to speak to participants about work related to this question. This post summarises some of my comments and adds some details that have emerged since. | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Blog | |
dc.format.medium | Blog | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Blog | en_US |
dc.format.medium | Blog | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | trademark | en_US |
dc.subject | brand | en_US |
dc.subject | clutter | en_US |
dc.title | Popular Brand Names and Clutter | en_US |
dc.type | Internet Publication | |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published online | en_US |
pubs.publisher-url | https://busanalyticsblog.wordpress.com/2019/03/27/popular-brand-names-and-clutter/ | en_US |
rioxxterms.funder | Default funder | en_US |
rioxxterms.identifier.project | Default project | en_US |
qmul.funder | Valuing Intangibles: Ranking Brands, Measuring Trade Mark Use::Economic and Social Research Council | en_US |