Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaras, G
dc.contributor.authorCingolani, I
dc.contributor.authorPatel, V
dc.contributor.authorPanzarasa, P
dc.contributor.authorAlderson, D
dc.contributor.authorDarzi, A
dc.contributor.authorAthanasiou, T
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-23T12:45:15Z
dc.date.available2019-04-23T12:45:15Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-20
dc.identifier.citationGaras, G., et al. (9000). "Surgical Innovation in the Era of Global Surgery: A Network Analysis." Annals of Surgery Publish Ahead of Print.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-4932
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/56968
dc.descriptionThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Annals of Surgery following peer review. The version of record Garas, G., et al. (9000). "Surgical Innovation in the Era of Global Surgery: A Network Analysis." Annals of Surgery Publish Ahead of Print. is available online at: doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003164en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To present a novel network-based framework for the study of collaboration in surgery and demonstrate how this can be used in practice to help build and nurture collaborations that foster innovation. BACKGROUND: Surgical innovation is a social process that originates from complex interactions among diverse participants. This has led to the emergence of numerous surgical collaboration networks. What is still needed is a rigorous investigation of these networks and of the relative benefits of various collaboration structures for research and innovation. METHODS: Network analysis of the real-world innovation network in robotic surgery. Hierarchical mixed-effect models were estimated to assess associations between network measures, research impact and innovation, controlling for the geographical diversity of collaborators, institutional categories, and whether collaborators belonged to industry or academia. RESULTS: The network comprised of 1700 organizations and 6000 links. The ability to reach many others along few steps in the network (closeness centrality), forging a geographically diverse international profile (network entropy), and collaboration with industry were all shown to be positively associated with research impact and innovation. Closed structures (clustering coefficient), in which collaborators also collaborate with each other, were found to have a negative association with innovation (P < 0.05 for all associations). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of global surgery and increasing complexity of surgical innovation, this study highlights the importance of establishing open networks spanning geographical boundaries. Network analysis offers a valuable framework for assisting surgeons in their efforts to forge and sustain collaborations with the highest potential of maximizing innovation and patient care.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDr. George Garas, MD, FRCS, holds a Royal College of Surgeons of England Doctoral Research Fellowship (Grant number GG 1037600/2017-2018) and is also supported by Imperial College London (Grant number CID 337755/2015- 2018) and the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation (Grant number F ZM 014-1/2016-2017).en_US
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnn Surg
dc.rightsAll rights reserved
dc.subjectcollaborationen_US
dc.subjectinnovationen_US
dc.subjectnetwork analysisen_US
dc.subjectResearchen_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.titleSurgical Innovation in the Era of Global Surgery: A Network Analysis.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SLA.0000000000003164
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30601251en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funderPhD Research Fellowship::Royal College of Surgeons of England.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record