Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcRobbie, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorHajek, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeerbux, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorKahan, BCen_US
dc.contributor.authorEldridge, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorTrépel, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorParrott, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorSnuggs, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, KMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-08T08:01:15Z
dc.date.available2019-03-19en_US
dc.date.issued2019-04-02en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/56748
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Obesity is a rising global threat to health and a major contributor to health inequalities. Weight management programmes that are effective, economical and reach underprivileged groups are needed. We examined whether a multi-modal group intervention structured to cater for clients from disadvantaged communities (Weight Action Programme; WAP) has better one-year outcomes than a primary care standard weight management intervention delivered by practice nurses (PNI). METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, 330 obese adults were recruited from general practices in London and allocated (2:1) to WAP (N = 221) delivered over eight weekly group sessions or PNI (N = 109) who received four sessions over eight weeks. Both interventions covered diet, physical activity and self-monitoring. The primary outcome was the change in weight from baseline at 12 months. To indicate value to the NHS, a cost effectiveness analysis estimated group differences in cost and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) related to WAP. RESULTS: Participants were recruited from September 2012 to January 2014 with follow-up completed in February 2015. Most participants were not in paid employment and 60% were from ethnic minorities. 88% of participants in each study arm provided at least one recorded outcome and were included in the primary analysis. Compared with the PNI, WAP was associated with greater weight loss overall (- 4·2 kg vs. - 2·3 kg; difference = - 1·9 kg, 95% CI: -3·7 to - 0·1; P = 0·04) and was more likely to generate a weight loss of at least 5% at 12 months (41% vs. 27%, OR = 14·61 95% CI: 2·32 to 91·96, P = 0·004). With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £7742/QALY, WAP would be considered highly cost effective compared to PNI. CONCLUSIONS: The task-based programme evaluated in this study can provide a template for an effective and economical approach to weight management that can reach clients from disadvantaged communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN45820471 . Registered 12/10/2012 (retrospectively registered).en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (project number 09/127/34)en_US
dc.format.extent365 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Public Healthen_US
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.subjectWeight lossen_US
dc.subjectWeight managementen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectBody Weighten_US
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDieten_US
dc.subjectEthnic Groupsen_US
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLondonen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.subjectOdds Ratioen_US
dc.subjectPovertyen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_US
dc.subjectProgram Evaluationen_US
dc.subjectQuality-Adjusted Life Yearsen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectStandard of Careen_US
dc.subjectUnemploymenten_US
dc.subjectWeight Lossen_US
dc.subjectWeight Reduction Programsen_US
dc.titleRandomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940108en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume19en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-03-19en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.