Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, K
dc.contributor.authorPotter, R
dc.contributor.authorPatel, S
dc.contributor.authorNichols, VP
dc.contributor.authorHaywood, KL
dc.contributor.authorHee, SW
dc.contributor.authorMistry, D
dc.contributor.authorCarnes, D
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, SJC
dc.contributor.authorUnderwood, M
dc.contributor.authorMatharu, MS
dc.contributor.authorCHESS team
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-21T16:54:51Z
dc.date.available2019-02-01
dc.date.available2019-02-21T16:54:51Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-11
dc.identifier.citationWhite, K., et al. (2019). "Chronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) – a mixed method feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial." BMC Medical Research Methodology 19(1): 30.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2288
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/55463
dc.descriptionThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_US
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Self-management support programmes are effective in a range of chronic conditions however there is limited evidence for their use in the treatment of chronic headaches. The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of four key aspects of a planned, future evaluative trial of a new education and self-management intervention for people with chronic headache: 1) recruiting people with chronic headache from primary care; 2) a telephone interview for the classification of chronic headaches; 3) the education and self-management intervention itself; and 4) the most appropriate patient reported outcomes (PROMS). METHODS: Participants were identified and recruited from general practices in the West Midlands of the UK. We developed a nurse-led chronic headache classification interview and assessed agreement with an interview with headache specialists. We developed and tested a group based education and self-management intervention to assess training and delivery receipt using observation, facilitator, and participant feedback. We explored the acceptability and relevance of PROMs using postal questionnaires, interviews and a smartphone app. RESULTS: Fourteen practices took part in the study and participant recruitment equated to 1.0/1000 registered patients. Challenges to recruitment were identified. We did 107 paired headache classification interviews. The level of agreement between nurse and doctor interviews was very good. We piloted the intervention in four groups with 18 participants. Qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators helped refine the intervention including shortening the overall intervention and increasing the facilitator training time. Participants completed 131 baseline questionnaires, measurement data quality, reliability and validity for headache-specific and generic measures was acceptable. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that recruiting people with chronic headache from primary care is feasible but challenging, our headache classification interview is fit for purpose, our study intervention is viable, and that our choice of outcome measures is acceptable to participants in a future randomised controlled trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN79708100. Registered 16th December 2015, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN79708100.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (RP-PG-1212-20018)en_US
dc.format.extent30 - ?
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Med Res Methodol
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution License
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectChronic headacheen_US
dc.subjectFeasibility studyen_US
dc.subjectOutcome measuresen_US
dc.subjectPrimary careen_US
dc.subjectRecruitmenten_US
dc.subjectSelf-managementen_US
dc.titleChronic Headache Education and Self-management Study (CHESS) - a mixed method feasibility study to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder2019. The authors
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-019-0672-5
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30744571en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume19en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-01-31
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution License