Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPETERSEN, SE
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, K
dc.contributor.authorBai, W
dc.contributor.authorMauger, C
dc.contributor.authorMedrano-Gracia, P
dc.contributor.authorSuinesiaputra, A
dc.contributor.authorLee, AM
dc.contributor.authorSanghvi, MM
dc.contributor.authorAung, N
dc.contributor.authorPiechnik, SK
dc.contributor.authorNeubauer, S
dc.contributor.authorRueckert, D
dc.contributor.authorYoung, AA
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-08T15:33:49Z
dc.date.available2018-12-17
dc.date.available2019-02-08T15:33:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-04
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/55253
dc.description.abstractLeft ventricular (LV) mass and volume are important indicators of clinical and pre-clinical disease processes. However, much of the shape information present in modern imaging examinations is currently ignored. Morphometric atlases enable precise quantification of shape and function, but there has been no objective comparison of different atlases in the same cohort. We compared two independent LV atlases using MRI scans of 4547 UK Biobank participants: (i) a volume atlas derived by automatic non-rigid registration of image volumes to a common template, and (ii) a surface atlas derived from manually drawn epicardial and endocardial surface contours. The strength of associations between atlas principal components and cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and angina) were quantified with logistic regression models and five-fold cross validation, using area under the ROC curve (AUC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) metrics. Both atlases exhibited similar principal components, showed similar relationships with risk factors, and had stronger associations (higher AUC and lower AIC) than a reference model based on LV mass and volume, for all risk factors (DeLong p < 0.05). Morphometric variations associated with each risk factor could be quantified and visualized and were similar between atlases. UK Biobank LV shape atlases are robust to construction method and show stronger relationships with cardiovascular risk factors than mass and volume.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Heart Foundation (PG/14/89/31194)
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (USA) 1R01HL121754
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientific Reports
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
dc.titleIndependent Left Ventricular Morphometric Atlases Show Consistent Relationships with Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A UK Biobank Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2019
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37916-6
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-17
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
qmul.funder“Creation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging reference standard for the UK Biobank imaging resource”::British Heart Foundationen_US
qmul.funder“Creation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging reference standard for the UK Biobank imaging resource”::British Heart Foundationen_US
qmul.funder“Creation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging reference standard for the UK Biobank imaging resource”::British Heart Foundationen_US
qmul.funder“Creation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging reference standard for the UK Biobank imaging resource”::British Heart Foundationen_US
qmul.funder“Creation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging reference standard for the UK Biobank imaging resource”::British Heart Foundationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record