Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeters, MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorAgbeko, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorZenasni, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorMackerness, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorVeys, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorRay, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMouncey, PRen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, DAen_US
dc.contributor.authorRowan, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorSCARF Study Investigators and the Pediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group (PICS-SG)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-26T11:06:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-10en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-10-12T09:40:53.766Z
dc.identifier.issn1529-7535en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/49143
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: Previous trials in adults with impaired immunity and respiratory failure suggest that early noninvasive ventilation avoids endotracheal intubation and improves survival. No randomized clinical trials have addressed this question in children. DESIGN: We undertook an open, parallel-group randomized trial in three pediatric hospitals. SUBJECTS: Children with impaired immunity and acute respiratory failure defined as tachypnoea (> 90th centile); a new requirement for supplemental oxygen; and new chest radiograph infiltrates. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly assigned to early PICU admission for continuous positive airways pressure (early continuous positive airways pressure) or to standard care. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation by 30 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One-hundred fourteen children met inclusion criteria of whom 42 were randomized between January 2013 and January 2016. There was no significant difference in endotracheal intubation by 30 days with early continuous positive airways pressure (10/21; 48%) compared with standard care (5/21; 24%), odds ratio 2.9 (0.8-10.9), p value equals to 0.11. However, 30-day mortality was significantly higher with early continuous positive airways pressure (7/21; 33%) compared with standard care (1/21; 5%), odds ratio 10.0 (1.1-90.6), p value equals to 0.041. Mortality at 90 days was early continuous positive airways pressure (11/21; 52%) versus standard care (4/21; 19%), odds ratio 4.7 (1.2-18.6), p value equals to 0.029, whereas mortality at 1 year was similar early continuous positive airways pressure (13/21; 61.9%) versus standard care (9/21; 42.7%), odds ratio 2.2 (0.6-7.4), p value equals to 0.22. There were two serious adverse events: early continuous positive airways pressure (pneumothorax) and standard care (hemothorax). CONCLUSIONS: This study provided no evidence to support early PICU admission for continuous positive airways pressure in children with acute respiratory failure and impaired immunity. There was a trend toward increased endotracheal intubation and a higher early mortality in the early continuous positive airways pressure group.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGreat Ormond Street Hospital Children’s Charity (Registered Charity Number 235825)en_US
dc.format.extent939 - 948en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPediatr Crit Care Meden_US
dc.titleRandomized Study of Early Continuous Positive Airways Pressure in Acute Respiratory Failure in Children With Impaired Immunity (SCARF) ISRCTN82853500.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PCC.0000000000001683en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30095746en_US
pubs.issue10en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume19en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record