Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUkah, UVen_US
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorHutcheon, JAen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnsermino, JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorGanzevoort, Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorThangaratinam, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMagee, LAen_US
dc.contributor.authorvon Dadelszen, Pen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-16T12:58:39Z
dc.date.available2018-01-18en_US
dc.date.issued2018-04en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-10-08T11:13:50.333Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/46183
dc.description.abstractEarly-onset preeclampsia is associated with severe maternal and perinatal complications. The fullPIERS model (Preeclampsia Integrated Estimate of Risk) showed both internal and external validities for predicting adverse maternal outcomes within 48 hours for women admitted with preeclampsia at any gestational age. This ability to recognize women at the highest risk of complications earlier could aid in preventing these adverse outcomes through improved management. Because the majority (≈70%) of the women in the model development had late-onset preeclampsia, we assessed the performance of the fullPIERS model in women with early-onset preeclampsia to determine whether it will be useful in this subgroup of women with preeclampsia. Three cohorts of women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia between 2012 and 2016, from tertiary hospitals in Canada, the Netherlands, and United Kingdom, were used. Using the published model equation, the probability of experiencing an adverse maternal outcome was calculated for each woman, and model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and stratification. The total data set included 1388 women, with an adverse maternal outcome rate of 7.3% within 48 hours of admission. The model had good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.86), and a calibration slope of 0.68. The estimated likelihood ratio at the predicted probability of ≥30% was 23.4 (95% confidence interval, 14.83-36.79), suggesting a strong evidence to rule in adverse maternal outcomes. The fullPIERS model will aid in identifying women admitted with early-onset preeclampsia in similar settings who are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes, thereby allowing timely and effective interventions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCanadian Institutes of Health Research (operating grants).en_US
dc.format.extent659 - 665en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHypertensionen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs License
dc.subjectcalibrationen_US
dc.subjectgestational ageen_US
dc.subjectpreeclampsiaen_US
dc.subjectpregnancyen_US
dc.subjectprognosisen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectCanadaen_US
dc.subjectDecision Support Techniquesen_US
dc.subjectEarly Medical Interventionen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectGestational Ageen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectNetherlandsen_US
dc.subjectPre-Eclampsiaen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectPregnancy Outcomeen_US
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.subjectQuality Improvementen_US
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectRisk Factorsen_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the fullPIERS Risk Prediction Model in Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2018 The Authors.
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10318en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440330en_US
pubs.issue4en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume71en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-18en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record