Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorInwald, DPen_US
dc.contributor.authorCanter, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorWoolfall, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorMouncey, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorZenasni, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Hara, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorLyttle, MDen_US
dc.contributor.authorNadel, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeters, MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, DAen_US
dc.contributor.authorRowan, KMen_US
dc.contributor.authorPERUKI (Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland) and PICS SG (Paediatric Intensive Care Society Study Group)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-24T15:50:02Z
dc.date.available2018-07-15en_US
dc.date.issued2018-08-07en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-08-16T09:21:44.621Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/43827
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of Fluids in Shock, a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of restricted fluid bolus volume (10 mL/kg) versus recommended practice (20 mL/kg). DESIGN: Nine-month pilot RCT with embedded mixed-method perspectives study. SETTING: 13 hospitals in England. PATIENTS: Children presenting to emergency departments with suspected infection and shock after 20 mL/kg fluid. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to further 10 or 20 mL/kg fluid boluses every 15 min for up to 4 hours if still in shock. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: These were based on progression criteria, including recruitment and retention, protocol adherence, separation, potential trial outcome measures, and parent and staff perspectives. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants were randomised; two were withdrawn. 23 (59%) of 39 in the 10 mL/kg arm and 25 (74%) of 34 in the 20 mL/kg arm required a single trial bolus before the shock resolved. 79% of boluses were delivered per protocol in the 10 mL/kg arm and 55% in the 20 mL/kg arm. The volume of study bolus fluid after 4 hours was 44% lower in the 10 mL/kg group (mean 14.5 vs 27.5 mL/kg). The Paediatric Index of Mortality-2 score was 2.1 (IQR 1.6-2.7) in the 10 mL/kg group and 2.0 (IQR 1.6-2.5) in the 20 mL/kg group. There were no deaths. Length of hospital stay, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions and PICU-free days at 30 days did not differ significantly between the groups. In the perspectives study, the trial was generally supported, although some problems with protocol adherence were described. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were not as unwell as expected. A larger trial is not feasible in its current design in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 15244462.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR HTA programme (13/04/105).en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArch Dis Childen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
dc.subjectaccident & emergencyen_US
dc.subjectgeneral paediatricsen_US
dc.subjectinfectious diseasesen_US
dc.subjectintensive careen_US
dc.subjectresuscitationen_US
dc.titleRestricted fluid bolus volume in early septic shock: results of the Fluids in Shock pilot trial.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/archdischild-2018-314924en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087153en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-07-15en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record