dc.contributor.author | Feng, Xue | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-19T14:34:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-19T14:34:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-05-29 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2018-06-05T13:27:55.826Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | Feng, X. 2018. Corporate Liability Towards Tort Victims in the Personal Injury Context. Queen Mary University of London | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/39748 | |
dc.description | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines approaches to establishing liability in corporate groups. It
considers the problem that arises when an insolvent subsidiary’s tort creditors
suffer personal injury, and try to pursue recourse against other group
companies – especially the parent company. Courts have tried to provide
answers regarding the parent company’s liability for the torts of their
subsidiaries, but have had limited success. The thesis reveals difficulty in
extending liability to the parent company by way of insolvency law provisions,
and by piercing the corporate veil. It recounts the hesitation of the courts in
broadening their perspective beyond individual companies, so as to take the
group itself as the responsible entity. The thesis points, furthermore, to
shortcomings in proposals for a new rule of unlimited pro rata liability.
Motivated by the inadequacy of current solutions to this pressing group
problem, the thesis explores alternative tort law remedies under an approach
suggested by the Supreme Court in the leading cases of VTB Capital Plc v
Nutritek International Corp and others and Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd.
Chapter III discusses the role of tort of negligence in establishing the parent
company’s liability. The work analyses case law decisions on how to widen the
application of negligence in the corporate group context, and compares UK law
with relevant United States’ and Australian case law. Since this group problem
involves multiple legal entities, Chapters IV and V evaluate the possibility of
using the doctrine of joint tortfeasance and/or the theory of vicarious liability in
establishing the parent company’s liability for its subsidiary company’s torts.
These two doctrines’ extensions in corporate tort cases are seldom discussed
in the literature. To conclude, tort law solutions, especially the doctrines of tort
of negligence and joint tortfeasance based on participations are recommended
to be further developed for corporate tort problems. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Chinese Scholarship Council | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Queen Mary University of London | en_US |
dc.rights | The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author | |
dc.subject | Law | en_US |
dc.subject | Tort victims | en_US |
dc.subject | Corporate liability | en_US |
dc.subject | Personal injury | en_US |
dc.subject | corporate groups | en_US |
dc.subject | insolvency | en_US |
dc.title | Corporate Liability Towards Tort Victims in the Personal Injury Context | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |