Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFeng, Xue
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T14:34:10Z
dc.date.available2018-06-19T14:34:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-29
dc.date.submitted2018-06-05T13:27:55.826Z
dc.identifier.citationFeng, X. 2018. Corporate Liability Towards Tort Victims in the Personal Injury Context. Queen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/39748
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines approaches to establishing liability in corporate groups. It considers the problem that arises when an insolvent subsidiary’s tort creditors suffer personal injury, and try to pursue recourse against other group companies – especially the parent company. Courts have tried to provide answers regarding the parent company’s liability for the torts of their subsidiaries, but have had limited success. The thesis reveals difficulty in extending liability to the parent company by way of insolvency law provisions, and by piercing the corporate veil. It recounts the hesitation of the courts in broadening their perspective beyond individual companies, so as to take the group itself as the responsible entity. The thesis points, furthermore, to shortcomings in proposals for a new rule of unlimited pro rata liability. Motivated by the inadequacy of current solutions to this pressing group problem, the thesis explores alternative tort law remedies under an approach suggested by the Supreme Court in the leading cases of VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp and others and Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd. Chapter III discusses the role of tort of negligence in establishing the parent company’s liability. The work analyses case law decisions on how to widen the application of negligence in the corporate group context, and compares UK law with relevant United States’ and Australian case law. Since this group problem involves multiple legal entities, Chapters IV and V evaluate the possibility of using the doctrine of joint tortfeasance and/or the theory of vicarious liability in establishing the parent company’s liability for its subsidiary company’s torts. These two doctrines’ extensions in corporate tort cases are seldom discussed in the literature. To conclude, tort law solutions, especially the doctrines of tort of negligence and joint tortfeasance based on participations are recommended to be further developed for corporate tort problems.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipChinese Scholarship Councilen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.rightsThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectTort victimsen_US
dc.subjectCorporate liabilityen_US
dc.subjectPersonal injuryen_US
dc.subjectcorporate groupsen_US
dc.subjectinsolvencyen_US
dc.titleCorporate Liability Towards Tort Victims in the Personal Injury Contexten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [4223]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record