Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, LFen_US
dc.contributor.authorHawking, MKDen_US
dc.contributor.authorOwens, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorLecky, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, NAen_US
dc.contributor.authorButler, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorGal, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorMcNulty, CAMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-09T17:31:35Z
dc.date.available2017-11-16en_US
dc.date.issued2018-07-23en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-01-08T15:39:43.143Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/34568
dc.description.abstractBackground: The TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) Antibiotics Toolkit aims to improve antimicrobial prescribing in primary care through guidance, interactive workshops with action planning, patient facing educational and audit materials. Objective: To explore GPs', nurses' and other stakeholders' views of TARGET. Design: Mixed methods. Method: In 2014, 40 UK GP staff and 13 stakeholders participated in interviews or focus groups. We analysed data using a thematic framework and normalization process theory (NPT). Results: Two hundred and sixty-nine workshop participants completed evaluation forms, and 40 GP staff, 4 trainers and 9 relevant stakeholders participated in interviews (29) or focus groups (24). GP staffs were aware of the issues around antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and how it related to their prescribing. Most participants stated that TARGET as a whole was useful. Participants suggested the workshop needed less background on AMR, be centred around clinical cases and allow more action planning time. Participants particularly valued comparison of their practice antibiotic prescribing with others and the TARGET Treating Your Infection leaflet. The leaflet needed greater accessibility via GP computer systems. Due to time, cost, accessibility and competing priorities, many GP staff had not fully utilized all resources, especially the audit and educational materials. Conclusions: We found evidence that the workshop is likely to be more acceptable and engaging if based around clinical scenarios, with less on AMR and more time on action planning. Greater promotion of TARGET, through Clinical Commissioning Group's (CCG's) and professional bodies, may improve uptake. Patient facing resources should be made accessible through computer shortcuts built into general practice software.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPublic Health England development fund 2013 no.158.en_US
dc.format.extent461 - 467en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFam Practen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agentsen_US
dc.subjectAntimicrobial Stewardshipen_US
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_US
dc.subjectFocus Groupsen_US
dc.subjectHealth Personnelen_US
dc.subjectHealth Promotionen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInterviews as Topicen_US
dc.subjectPractice Patterns, Physicians'en_US
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_US
dc.subjectQualitative Researchen_US
dc.titleAn evaluation of the TARGET (Treat Antibiotics Responsibly; Guidance, Education, Tools) Antibiotics Toolkit to improve antimicrobial stewardship in primary care-is it fit for purpose?en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/fampra/cmx131en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300965en_US
pubs.issue4en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume35en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record