Protocol for developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set for endometriosis.
e013998 - ?
MetadataShow full item record
INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological disease characterised by pain and subfertility. Randomised controlled trials evaluating treatments for endometriosis have reported many different outcomes and outcome measures. This variation restricts effective data synthesis limiting the usefulness of research to inform clinical practice. To address these methodological concerns, we aim to develop, disseminate and implement a core outcome set for endometriosis engaging with key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with endometriosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international steering group has been established, including healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives. Potential outcomes identified from a systematic review of the literature will be entered into a modified Delphi method. Key stakeholders will be invited to participate including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with endometriosis. Participants will be invited to score individual outcomes on a nine-point Likert scale anchored between 1 (not important) and 9 (critical). Repeated reflection and rescoring should promote whole and individual stakeholder group converge towards consensus, 'core', outcomes. High-quality outcome measures will be associated with core outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The implementation of a core outcome set for endometriosis within future clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical guidelines will enhance the availability of comparable data to facilitate evidence-based patient care. This study was prospectively registered with Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative; number: 691.
AuthorsHirsch, M; Duffy, JMN; Barker, C; Hummelshoj, L; Johnson, NP; Mol, B; Khan, KS; Farquhar, C; International Collaboration to Harmonize Outcomes and Measures for Endometriosis (iHOME)
- College Publications 
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Al Wattar, BH; Placzek, A; Troko, J; Pirie, AM; Khan, KS; McCorry, D; Zamora, J; Thangaratinam, S; EMPIRE Collaborative Network, (2015-10-30)Studies on pregnant women with epilepsy should evaluate both neurological and pregnancy outcomes. We undertook a systematic review of the literature of studies on pregnant women with epilepsy to collate the outcomes reported, ...
The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: a pooled analysis. Reininghaus, U; McCabe, R; Slade, M; Burns, T; Croudace, T; Priebe, S (2013-10-30)Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is ...
Variations in the reporting of outcomes used in systematic reviews of treatment effectiveness research in bladder pain syndrome. Tirlapur, SA; Ni Riordain, R; Khan, KS; EBM-CONNECT Collaboration, (2014-09)This paper investigates the quality of outcomes reported in systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of bladder pain syndrome and its relationship with study quality and journal impact factor. We searched ...