Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKasza, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorHemming, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorHooper, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorForbes, ABen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-16T11:37:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-03en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-10-19T10:39:29.149Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/31336
dc.description.abstractStepped wedge and cluster randomised crossover trials are examples of cluster randomised designs conducted over multiple time periods that are being used with increasing frequency in health research. Recent systematic reviews of both of these designs indicate that the within-cluster correlation is typically taken account of in the analysis of data using a random intercept mixed model, implying a constant correlation between any two individuals in the same cluster no matter how far apart in time they are measured: within-period and between-period intra-cluster correlations are assumed to be identical. Recently proposed extensions allow the within- and between-period intra-cluster correlations to differ, although these methods require that all between-period intra-cluster correlations are identical, which may not be appropriate in all situations. Motivated by a proposed intensive care cluster randomised trial, we propose an alternative correlation structure for repeated cross-sectional multiple-period cluster randomised trials in which the between-period intra-cluster correlation is allowed to decay depending on the distance between measurements. We present results for the variance of treatment effect estimators for varying amounts of decay, investigating the consequences of the variation in decay on sample size planning for stepped wedge, cluster crossover and multiple-period parallel-arm cluster randomised trials. We also investigate the impact of assuming constant between-period intra-cluster correlations instead of decaying between-period intra-cluster correlations. Our results indicate that in certain design configurations, including the one corresponding to the proposed trial, a correlation decay can have an important impact on variances of treatment effect estimators, and hence on sample size and power. An R Shiny app allows readers to interactively explore the impact of correlation decay.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Excellence Grant ID 1035261, awarded to the Victorian Centre for Biostatistics (ViCBiostat), and Project Grant ID 1108283.en_US
dc.format.extent703 - 716en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStat Methods Med Resen_US
dc.rightsJ Kasza et al., Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials, Statistical Methods in Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280217734981. Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.
dc.subjectExponential decayen_US
dc.subjectcluster randomised trialen_US
dc.subjectintra-cluster correlationen_US
dc.subjectsample sizeen_US
dc.subjectstepped wedgeen_US
dc.titleImpact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2017
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0962280217734981en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29027505en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume28en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record