Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarey, IMen_US
dc.contributor.authorCook, DGen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Wilde, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBremner, SAen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaine, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorStrachan, DPen_US
dc.contributor.authorHilton, SRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-10T12:43:45Z
dc.date.available2003-09-30en_US
dc.date.issued2003-09-30en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/3100
dc.descriptionPMCID: PMC240086
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The General Practice Research Database (GPRD) and Doctor's Independent Network Database (DIN), are large electronic primary care databases compiled in the UK during the 1990s. They provide a valuable resource for epidemiological and health services research. GPRD (based on VAMP) presents notes as a series of discrete episodes, whereas DIN is based on a system (MEDITEL) that used a Problem Orientated Medical Record (POMR) which links prescriptions to diagnostic problems. We have examined the implications for research of these different underlying philosophies. METHODS: Records of 40,183 children from 141 practices in DIN and 76,310 from 464 practices in GRPD who were followed to age 5 were used to compare the volume of recording of prescribing and diagnostic codes in the two databases. To assess the importance and additional value of the POMR within DIN, the appropriateness of diagnostic linking to skin emollient prescriptions was investigated. RESULTS: Variation between practices for both the number of days on which prescriptions were issued and diagnoses were recorded was marked in both databases. Mean number of "prescription days" during the first 5 years of life was similar in DIN (19.5) and in GPRD (19.8), but the average number of "diagnostic days" was lower in DIN (15.8) than in GPRD (22.9). Adjustment for linkage increased the average "diagnostic days" to 23.1 in DIN. 32.7% of emollient prescriptions in GPRD appeared with an eczema diagnosis on the same day compared to only 19.4% in DIN; however, 86.4% of prescriptions in DIN were linked to an earlier eczema diagnosis. More specifically 83% of emollient prescriptions appeared under a problem heading of eczema in the 121 practices that were using problem headings satisfactorily. CONCLUSION: Prescribing records in DIN and GPRD are very similar, but the usage of diagnostic codes is more parsimonious in DIN because of its POMR structure. Period prevalence rates will be underestimated in DIN unless this structure is taken into account. The advantage of the POMR is that in 121 of 141 practices using problem headings as intended, most prescriptions can be linked to a problem heading providing a specific reason for their issue.en_US
dc.format.extent14 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Fam Practen_US
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen_US
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen_US
dc.subjectDatabases, Factualen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosis-Related Groupsen_US
dc.subjectDrug Prescriptionsen_US
dc.subjectEczemaen_US
dc.subjectEmollientsen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologic Studiesen_US
dc.subjectFamily Practiceen_US
dc.subjectHealth Services Researchen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInfanten_US
dc.subjectInfant, Newbornen_US
dc.subjectMedical Records, Problem-Orienteden_US
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_US
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.titleImplications of the problem orientated medical record (POMR) for research using electronic GP databases: a comparison of the Doctors Independent Network Database (DIN) and the General Practice Research Database (GPRD).en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2296-4-14en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14516473en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume4en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2003-09-30en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record