Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStonebridge, Lyndsey
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-27T14:32:01Z
dc.date.available2017-11-27T14:32:01Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.date.submitted2017-11-27T13:28:33.589Z
dc.identifier.citationStonebridge, L. 1995. THE DESTRUCTIVE ELEMENT : ENGLISH PSYCHOANALYSIS, LITERATURE AND CRITICISM FROM THE 1920S TO WORLD WAR TWO. Queen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/28954
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.description.abstractWhereas recent studies of psychoanalysis and modernism have tended to 'translate' literature through contemporary French psychoanalytic thought, this dissertation opens up a historical dialogue between English psychoanalysis, modernist writing, art criticism and literary criticism. I argue that a shared anxiety about the redemptive role of art in a period which both writers and analysts characterise as marked by 'unsublimated' drives towards destruction, is coupled with an increasing concern with the precariousness of the frontier between self and culture, and between art and the social and political ideologies upon which culture rests. This double movement is reflected in the structure of the dissertation which begins with a comparison of attempts to make a moral and~aesthetic out of 'the destructive element' by I.A. Richards and Melanie Klein, and ends with Marion Milner's and Stevie Smith's speculations on the complicity between the violence of the self and the violence of the outside world in the thirties. Other writers discussed include W.H. Auden, T.S. Eliot, Roger Fry and Virginia Woolf, as well as Ella Freeman Sharpe, Paula Heimann, Hanna Segal and Adrian Stokes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Grant- Kingston University
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of London
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.titleTHE DESTRUCTIVE ELEMENT : ENGLISH PSYCHOANALYSIS, LITERATURE AND CRITICISM FROM THE 1920S TO WORLD WAR TWO.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [4223]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record