dc.contributor.author | French, Edmund John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-04T13:34:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-04T13:34:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-10-04T13:54:58.732Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | French, E.J. 1998. Adam of Buckfield and the early universities. Queen Mary University of London | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/26687 | |
dc.description | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis represents a systematic analysis of one of the commentaries of Adam of
Buckfield on the physical works of Aristotle. The aim is to indicate how natural
philosophy was taught in the early universities and how Aristotle's text became canonical
in the arts course. The evidence, from extensive palaeographical research, is used to
assess Buckfield's influence at an important time when Oxford was a young university,
still shaping its curricula. It is argued that since natural philosophy was forbidden in the
university of Paris during the time when Buckfield was teaching, a particular importance
attaches to Oxford's interpretation of the physical works of Aristotle. The subsequent
revival of natural philosophy in Paris and other universities that followed the Parisian
model, it is argued, therefore owes a considerable debt to Oxford and its early masters,
among whom Adam of Buckfleld was the earliest to complete a commentary on all the
major physical works. The thesis examines the manuscript traditions in which Buckfield's
works survives: separate copies of commentaries; whole commentaries written out in the
Corpus vetustius collections of physical works; fragments of commentaries in the
standard gloss in the same collection. Reasons are suggested for the difference between
the natures of these manuscripts in the context of thirteenth-century teaching. A special
study of Buckfleld's commentary on the De dfferentia spirilus et anime illuminates
these kinds of manuscripts, indicates where further work will be profitable, and allows a
reconstruction of the teaching material and techniques of Oxford regent masters of the
thirteenth century. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Queen Mary University of London | |
dc.subject | Geography | en_US |
dc.title | Adam of Buckfield and the early universities | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author | |