A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
MetadataShow full item record
BACKGROUND: An evaluation of outcome reporting is required to develop a core outcome set. OBJECTIVES: To assess primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in pre-eclampsia trials. SEARCH STRATEGY: Five online databases were searched from inception to January 2016 using terms including "preeclampsia" and "randomized controlled trial". SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia published in any language were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcomes and data on outcome measure reporting were systematically extracted and categorized. MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 79 randomized trials including data from 31 615 women were included. Of those, 38 (48%) reported 35 different primary outcomes; 28 were maternal outcomes and seven were fetal/neonatal outcomes. Three randomized trials reported composite outcomes, incorporating between six and nine outcome components. The method of definition or measurement was infrequently or poorly reported. Even when outcomes were consistent across trials, different methods of definition or measurement were frequently described. CONCLUSIONS: In randomized trials evaluating interventions for pre-eclampsia, critical information related to the primary outcome, including definition and measurement, is regularly omitted. Developing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia trials would help to inform primary outcome selection and outcome measure reporting.
AuthorsDuffy, JMN; Hirsch, M; Gale, C; Pealing, L; Kawsar, A; Showell, M; Williamson, PR; Khan, KS; Ziebland, S; McManus, RJ; International Collaboration to Harmonize Outcomes for Pre-eclampsia (iHOPE)
- College Publications 
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Al Wattar, BH; Placzek, A; Troko, J; Pirie, AM; Khan, KS; McCorry, D; Zamora, J; Thangaratinam, S; EMPIRE Collaborative Network, (2015-10-30)Studies on pregnant women with epilepsy should evaluate both neurological and pregnancy outcomes. We undertook a systematic review of the literature of studies on pregnant women with epilepsy to collate the outcomes reported, ...
The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: a pooled analysis. Reininghaus, U; McCabe, R; Slade, M; Burns, T; Croudace, T; Priebe, S (2013-10-30)Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is ...
Variations in the reporting of outcomes used in systematic reviews of treatment effectiveness research in bladder pain syndrome. Tirlapur, SA; Ni Riordain, R; Khan, KS; EBM-CONNECT Collaboration, (2014-09)This paper investigates the quality of outcomes reported in systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of bladder pain syndrome and its relationship with study quality and journal impact factor. We searched ...