Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLofstedt, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorOsman, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-02T12:47:26Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09en_US
dc.date.issued2017-05-11en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-05-24T09:15:48.399Z
dc.identifier.issn1366-9877en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/23521
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has long been an advocate of greater transparency. One of the tools promoted to achieve more transparency is to describe the underlying uncertainties within EFSA’s scientific opinions. The key issue though is whether members of the European public actually want to know more about the details of the scientific uncertainties associated with a certain risk topic or a scientific opinion or would they prefer to know less about these uncertainties? In this short research note we attempt to address this question.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 11en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Risk Researchen_US
dc.titleUncertainty analysis: results from an empirical pilot study. A research noteen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© Taylor & Francis
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13669877.2017.1313768en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-09en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record