Uncertainty analysis: results from an empirical pilot study. A research note
dc.contributor.author | Lofstedt, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | McLoughlin, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Osman, M | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-02T12:47:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-09 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2017-05-11 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-05-24T09:15:48.399Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1366-9877 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/23521 | |
dc.description.abstract | © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has long been an advocate of greater transparency. One of the tools promoted to achieve more transparency is to describe the underlying uncertainties within EFSA’s scientific opinions. The key issue though is whether members of the European public actually want to know more about the details of the scientific uncertainties associated with a certain risk topic or a scientific opinion or would they prefer to know less about these uncertainties? In this short research note we attempt to address this question. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 - 11 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Risk Research | en_US |
dc.title | Uncertainty analysis: results from an empirical pilot study. A research note | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | © Taylor & Francis | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13669877.2017.1313768 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Accepted | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2017-05-09 | en_US |