| dc.description.abstract | This thesis develops a novel, unified, syntactic and semantic analysis for a range
of get constructions including those with adjectival, prepositional and verbal
complements. There are two reasons to believe that such an approach is justified.
First, the relevant get constructions demonstrate similar semantic characteristics
across complement types, e.g. the presence of Cause (in the sense of
Pylkkanen 2008), leading to an obligatorily resultative change-of-state interpretation.
Second, the range of constructions display syntactic similarities: for each
get construction with no external argument there is a corresponding construction
with an external argument; and all of the relevant get constructions take
a predicative small clause complement. The approach defended here utilises a
formal syntactic and semantic framework to propose an analysis in which get
is interpreted as a causative functional head which takes a PredP complement
whose function is to add a Holder argument to the property expression in its
complement (Bowers 1993, Adger and Ramchand 2003). At this point one of
two things may occur. Either (i), the Holder argument raises to the sentential
subject position, or (ii), it remains in-situ and an argument external to the
causative head is introduced, and then raised to subject position. The thesis
shows that, contra Pylkk¨anen 2008, and unlike any other English constructions,
get constructions may project Cause without necessarily ‘bundling’ it together
with Voice in the syntax. The resulting claims impact on topics in theoretical
linguistics as varied as predication, causation, reflexivity and binding, property
theory and passivisation, and hold consequences for the nature of the syntax
semantics interface. | |
