Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForster, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorNixon, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorHolloway, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorMellish, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorAnwar, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorBreen, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarrin, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-20T09:21:55Z
dc.date.available2015-04-06en_US
dc.date.issued2015-08en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-09-20T08:56:49.606Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/15446
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We developed a new postdischarge system of care comprising a structured assessment covering longer-term problems experienced by patients with stroke and their carers, linked to evidence-based treatment algorithms and reference guides (the longer-term stroke care system of care) to address the poor longer-term recovery experienced by many patients with stroke. METHODS: A pragmatic, multicentre, cluster randomized controlled trial of this system of care. Eligible patients referred to community-based Stroke Care Coordinators were randomized to receive the new system of care or usual practice. The primary outcome was improved patient psychological well-being (General Health Questionnaire-12) at 6 months; secondary outcomes included functional outcomes for patients, carer outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Follow-up was through self-completed postal questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-two stroke services were randomized (29 participated); 800 patients (399 control; 401 intervention) and 208 carers (100 control; 108 intervention) were recruited. In intention to treat analysis, the adjusted difference in patient General Health Questionnaire-12 mean scores at 6 months was -0.6 points (95% confidence interval, -1.8 to 0.7; P=0.394) indicating no evidence of statistically significant difference between the groups. Costs of Stroke Care Coordinator inputs, total health and social care costs, and quality-adjusted life year gains at 6 months, 12 months, and over the year were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This robust trial demonstrated no benefit in clinical or cost-effectiveness outcomes associated with the new system of care compared with usual Stroke Care Coordinator practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: ISRCTN 67932305.en_US
dc.format.extent2212 - 2219en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStrokeen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.subjectcluster randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectcommunity health servicesen_US
dc.subjectcost-benefit analysisen_US
dc.subjectquality-adjusted life yearsen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectstrokeen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectCluster Analysisen_US
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysisen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLong-Term Careen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.titleCluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of a System of Longer-Term Stroke Care.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2015 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.008585en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26152298en_US
pubs.issue8en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume46en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-04-06en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record