Variation in the reporting of outcomes among pregnant women with epilepsy: a systematic review.
193 - 199
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
MetadataShow full item record
Studies on pregnant women with epilepsy should evaluate both neurological and pregnancy outcomes. We undertook a systematic review of the literature of studies on pregnant women with epilepsy to collate the outcomes reported, and the quality of outcomes report in these studies. We searched major electronic databases (from 1999 until January 2015). Two independent reviewers selected studies and extracted data on study design, the risk of bias of the studies, journal impact factor and the quality of reported outcomes. We assessed the quality outcomes report using a six items standardised tool (score range 0-6). There were 70 different outcomes reported in 232 studies (maternal neurological (13/70, 19%), fetal and neonatal (28/70, 40%), and obstetric outcomes (29/70, 41%)). Most studies reported on major congenital fetal abnormalities (103/232, 44%), followed by live birth (60/232, 26%). Quality of the reported outcomes was poor (mean 1.54, SD 1.36). It was associated with journal impact factor (p=0.007), but not with study design (p=0.60), or risk of bias (p=0.17). The outcomes reported in studies on pregnant women with epilepsy varied widely, and the quality of the outcomes report was poor. There is a need to identify a set of core outcome to harmonise reporting in future clinical studies.
AuthorsAl Wattar, BH; Placzek, A; Troko, J; Pirie, AM; Khan, KS; McCorry, D; Zamora, J; Thangaratinam, S; EMPIRE Collaborative Network,
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Hirsch, M; Duffy, JMN; Barker, C; Hummelshoj, L; Johnson, NP; Mol, B; Khan, KS; Farquhar, C; International Collaboration to Harmonize Outcomes and Measures for Endometriosis (iHOME),INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a common gynaecological disease characterised by pain and subfertility. Randomised controlled trials evaluating treatments for endometriosis have reported many different outcomes and outcome ...
The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: a pooled analysis. Reininghaus, U; McCabe, R; Slade, M; Burns, T; Croudace, T; Priebe, S (2013-10-30)Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is ...
Variations in the reporting of outcomes used in systematic reviews of treatment effectiveness research in bladder pain syndrome. Tirlapur, SA; Ni Riordain, R; Khan, KS; EBM-CONNECT Collaboration, (2014-09)This paper investigates the quality of outcomes reported in systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of bladder pain syndrome and its relationship with study quality and journal impact factor. We searched ...