Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarson, R. Neil
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-22T09:15:02Z
dc.date.available2011-07-22T09:15:02Z
dc.date.issued1974
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1390
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is an attempt to describe the characteristics of Thomas Heywood's dramatic style. The study is divided into three parts. The first deals with the playwright's theatrical career and discusses how his practical experience as actor and sharer might have affected his technique as a dramatic writer. The second part defines the scope of the investigation and contains the bulk of the analysis of Heywood's plays. My approach to the mechanics of playwriting is both practical and theoretical. I have attempted to come to an understanding of the technicalities of Heywood's craftsmanship by studying the changes he made in Sir Thomas Moore and in the sources he used for his plays. At the same time, I have tried to comprehend the aesthetic framework within which he worked by referring to the critical ideas of the period and especially to opinions expressed by Heywood himself in An Apology for Actors and elsewhere. The third part of the thesis is an application of the findings of Part Two to the problems of authorship in Fortune by Land and Sea. The thesis shows Heywood's emphasis on essentially theatrical qualities such as visual effects and effects which can be obtained by controlling the relationship of the actor to the audience. It also illustrates his rejection of "Aristotelian" principles of dramatic construction in favour of "rules" derived from the native morality and romance traditions'., and shaped by contemporary theatrical conditions. It concludes that Heywood is essentially a didactic artist but one interested in technical experimentation and audience response.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of London
dc.subjectElectronic Engineeringen_US
dc.titleThe dramaturgy of Thomas Heywood 1594-1613en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [3366]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record