Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMabee, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-01T14:35:01Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1474-7731en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7820
dc.description.abstractThe articulation of international and transnational terrorism as a key issue in US security policy, as a result of the 9/11 attacks, has not only led to a policy rethink, it has also included a bureaucratic shift within the US, showing a re-thinking of the role of borders within US security policy. Drawing substantively on the 'securitisation' approach to security studies, the article analyses the discourse of US security in order to examine the founding of the Department of Homeland Security, noting that its mission provides a new way of conceptualising 'borders' for US national security. The securitisation of terrorism is, therefore, not only represented by marking terrorism as a security issue, it is also solidified in the organisation of security policy-making within the US state. As such, the impact of a 'war on terror' provides an important moment for analysing the re-articulation of what security is in the US, and, in theoretical terms, for reaffirming the importance of a relationship between the production of threat and the institutionalisation of threat response. © 2007 Taylor & Francis.en_US
dc.format.extent385 - 397en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGlobalizationsen_US
dc.titleRe-imagining the Borders of US Security after 9/11: Securitisation, Risk, and the Creation of the Department of Homeland Securityen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14747730701532567en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notes18 monthsen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume4en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record