• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    "Where be his quiddities now?": Law and Language in Hamlet 
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Law
    • Department of Law
    • "Where be his quiddities now?": Law and Language in Hamlet
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Law
    • Department of Law
    • "Where be his quiddities now?": Law and Language in Hamlet
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    "Where be his quiddities now?": Law and Language in Hamlet

    View/Open
    Published version (187.3Kb)
    Editors
    Freeman, M
    Smith, F
    Volume
    15
    Pagination
    201 - 220 (19)
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press
    Publisher URL
    http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/
    ISBN-10
    0199673667
    ISBN-13
    978-0199673667
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Journal
    Law and Language
    Current Legal Issues
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Abuses of monarchy, nobility, church or wealth are certainly central to Shakespeare. However, depictions of law and its abuses do not casually blend into other critical images of power or authority in the corpus. In Hamlet, we see how it is language that Shakespeare identifies both as central to law’s specific mode of exercising power, and as a distinct means by which law’s veneer of justice conceals the manipulation of power towards oppressive ends. That theme is richly foreshadowed in the earliest plays, as exemplified by the pseudo-trial of the jurist Lord Saye during the peasant rebellion depicted in Henry VI, Part Two. Saye’s humanist, proto-liberal view of law is assailed precisely on grounds of the manipulative linguistic techniques that it conceals. In Hamlet, the medieval trappings of Shakespearean political drama have worn thinner. That same duplicitous character of legal language now re-emerges in a more overtly modern, Foucauldian surveillance state. It extends beyond the conventionally legal or political, encompassing the play’s familiar existential crises.
    Authors
    HEINZE, E
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7673
    Collections
    • Department of Law [788]
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.